ANTISPASMODIC DRUGS TO REDUCE DISCOMFORT AND COLONIC SPASM DURING BARIUM ENEMAS - COMPARISON OF ORAL HYOSCYAMINE, IV GLUCAGON, AND NO DRUG

被引:38
作者
BOVA, JG
JURDI, RA
BENNETT, WF
机构
[1] Department of Radiology, S209 Rhodes Hall, Ohio State University Hospitals, Columbus, OH 43210
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.161.5.8273637
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. Parenterally administered glucagon is currently the agent of choice for reducing abdominal discomfort and colonic spasm during a barium enema. Because glucagon is expensive and frequently causes nausea, we evaluated the use of oral hyoscyamine sulfate as an alternate agent and compared it with IV glucagon and no medication. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. A total of 349 adult patients undergoing barium enema examinations were randomly assigned in a prospective fashion to one of four groups: (1) no medication (87 patients); (2) 1 mg of IV glucagon (88 patients); (3) 0.125 mg of oral hyoscyamine sulfate (87 patients); and (4) 0.25 mg of oral hyoscyamine sulfate (87 patients). The degree of distension of the colon on radiographs obtained after fluoroscopy, the amount of abdominal distress after the procedure, and the number of side effects (nausea, palpitations, blurred vision, dry mouth) were analyzed. To evaluate the amount of abdominal discomfort more completely, we asked the last 248 patients to estimate the level of severity of the discomfort (none, mild, moderate, or severe). RESULTS. We found no difference in the degree of distension of the colon in the four groups (p =.63). Most patients (79%) had some degree of abdominal discomfort. Fewer patients in the group who received no medication (10%) had no or mild pain compared with those given glucagon (1 5%, p < .05), 0.125 mg of hyoscyamine (14%, p < .05), or 0.25 mg of hyoscyamine (12%, p = .15). Less nausea occurred in the group that received 0.125 mg of hyoscyamine than in the other groups (p < .03). No patients in any of the groups had allergic or severe side effects. CONCLUSION. When compared with IV glucagon, oral hyoscyamine had fewer side effects, but the degree of colonic distension or abdominal distress was not significantly different. In addition, hyoscyamine is considerably less expensive than glucagon and can be given orally. Patients who received medications had less discomfort than those who did not. However, the degree of distension was not different.
引用
收藏
页码:965 / 968
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   GLUCAGON - COMMON UNTOWARD REACTIONS - REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS [J].
CHERNISH, SM ;
MAGLINTE, DDT .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 177 (01) :145-146
[2]   ANAPHYLACTIC AND ALLERGIC REACTIONS DURING DOUBLE-CONTRAST STUDIES - IS GLUCAGON OR BARIUM SUSPENSION THE ALLERGEN [J].
GELFAND, DW ;
SOWERS, JC ;
DEPONTE, KA ;
SUMNER, TE ;
OTT, DJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1985, 144 (02) :405-406
[3]   EFFICACY OF CIMETROPIUM BROMIDE AS PRE-MEDICATION FOR DOUBLE-CONTRAST BARIUM ENEMA [J].
GOLFIERI, G ;
PORTA, E ;
IMBIMBO, BP ;
MUZIO, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1988, 61 (731) :1087-1088
[4]   PHARMACOLOGICAL AGENTS IN GASTROINTESTINAL RADIOLOGY [J].
HALL, FM .
RADIOLOGY, 1987, 165 (01) :289-289
[5]   GLUCAGON AND BARIUM ENEMA EXAMINATIONS - CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIAL [J].
HARNED, RK ;
STELLING, CB ;
WILLIAMS, S ;
WOLF, GL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1976, 126 (05) :981-984
[6]  
MCEROY GK, 1993, AM HOSPITAL FORMULAR, P703
[7]   EFFECT OF GLUCAGON ON BARIUM-ENEMA EXAMINATION [J].
MEEROFF, JC ;
JORGENS, J ;
ISENBERG, JI .
RADIOLOGY, 1975, 115 (01) :5-7
[8]   HYPOTONIC COLON EXAMINATION WITH GLUCAGON [J].
MILLER, RE ;
CHERNISH, SM ;
SKUCAS, J ;
ROSENAK, BD ;
RODDA, BE .
RADIOLOGY, 1974, 113 (03) :555-562
[9]   COMPARISON OF L-HYOSCYAMINE, GLUCAGON, AND PLACEBO FOR AIR-CONTRAST UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL SERIES [J].
MOELLER, G ;
HUGHES, JJ ;
MANGANO, FA ;
GELORMINI, R ;
TOMLINSON, TL ;
DIPALMA, JA .
GASTROINTESTINAL RADIOLOGY, 1992, 17 (03) :195-198
[10]   THE VALUE OF GLUCAGON IN ROUTINE BARIUM INVESTIGATIONS OF THE GASTROINTESTINAL-TRACT [J].
ROTHE, AJ ;
YOUNG, JWR ;
KERAMATI, B .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1987, 22 (10) :786-791