DOSE-FINDING STUDY OF GRANISETRON IN PATIENTS RECEIVING HIGH-DOSE CISPLATIN CHEMOTHERAPY

被引:59
作者
RIVIERE, A
机构
[1] Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen
[2] Fondation Bergonie, Bordeaux
[3] St Josef Hospital, Bochum
[4] Centre Val D’Aurelle II, Montpellier
[5] Fachklinik Hornheide, Muinster
[6] Tygerberg Hospital, University of Stellenbosh, Cape Town
[7] University of Natal, Durban
[8] Vincenz, Krankenhaus, Paderborn
[9] Centre Oscar-Lambret, Lille
[10] Hopital Coste-Boyere, La Garde, Toulon
[11] Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen
[12] Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice
[13] HNO-Universitatsklinik, Homburg
[14] Centre Rene Gauducheau, Nantes
[15] St Johannes-Hospital, Duisburg
[16] Centre Eugene Marquis, Rennes
[17] Kreiskrankenhaus, Krumbach
[18] SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Reigate, Surrey
关键词
D O I
10.1038/bjc.1994.187
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The efficacy and safety of three different doses of granisetron (2 mu g kg(-1), group A; 10 mu g kg(-1), group B; 40 mu g kg(-1), group C) were compared in a randomised, double-blind study of 157 patients due to receive high-dose cisplatin therapy (mean dose > 97 mg m(-2)). In each group, up to two 3 mg rescue doses of granisetron were allowed if more than mild nausea or vomiting occurred. In group A 30.8%, in group B 61.5% and in group C 67.9% of patients were complete responders (i.e. no vomiting or nothing worse than mild nausea) during the first 24 h. These differences are significant between groups A and B, and A and C. There were no statistically significant differences in any efficacy variable between the 10 mu g kg(-1) and 40 mu g kg(-1) groups, although in each case the trend favoured the higher dose. Additional rescue doses resulted in resolved or improved symptoms in 95.3% for the first rescue dose and 93.3% for the second. Over the 7 days of the study, 82.7%, 82.7% and 86.8% of patients in groups A, B and C respectively were treated with granisetron alone. Headache was the most common side-effect, reported by 9.6% of patients; the majority of headaches were mild. There was no difference between the treatment groups regarding the adverse event rate. We concluded that prophylactic doses of 10 or 40 mu g kg(-1) lead to a safe and satisfactory degree of control of nausea and vomiting induced by high-dose cisplatin.
引用
收藏
页码:967 / 971
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
BLOWER PR, 1990, EUR J CANCER, V19, pS8
[2]  
BONNETERRE J, 1991, P ASCO, V10, P323
[3]   NEUROPHARMACOLOGY OF CHEMOTHERAPY-INDUCED EMESIS [J].
BORISON, HL ;
MCCARTHY, LE .
DRUGS, 1983, 25 :8-17
[4]  
CHEVALLIER B, 1990, EUR J CANCER, V26, pS33
[5]   ON THE RECEIVING END PATIENT PERCEPTION OF THE SIDE-EFFECTS OF CANCER-CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
COATES, A ;
ABRAHAM, S ;
KAYE, SB ;
SOWERBUTTS, T ;
FREWIN, C ;
FOX, RM ;
TATTERSALL, MHN .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER & CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1983, 19 (02) :203-208
[6]  
CUPISSOL DR, 1990, EUR J CANCER, V26, pS23
[7]   ANTI-EMETIC EFFICACY OF HIGH-DOSE METOCLOPRAMIDE - RANDOMIZED TRIALS WITH PLACEBO AND PROCHLORPERAZINE IN PATIENTS WITH CHEMOTHERAPY-INDUCED NAUSEA AND VOMITING [J].
GRALLA, RJ ;
ITRI, LM ;
PISKO, SE ;
SQUILLANTE, AE ;
KELSEN, DP ;
BRAUN, DW ;
BORDIN, LA ;
BRAUN, TJ ;
YOUNG, CW .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1981, 305 (16) :905-909
[8]   INCIDENCE, COURSE, AND SEVERITY OF DELAYED NAUSEA AND VOMITING FOLLOWING THE ADMINISTRATION OF HIGH-DOSE CISPLATIN [J].
KRIS, MG ;
GRALLA, RJ ;
CLARK, RA ;
TYSON, LB ;
OCONNELL, JP ;
WERTHEIM, MS ;
KELSEN, DP .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1985, 3 (10) :1379-1384
[9]  
KRIS MG, 1987, CANCER, V60, P2816, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19871201)60:11<2816::AID-CNCR2820601137>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-7