RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF ROUTINE CERVICAL EXAMINATIONS IN PREGNANCY

被引:62
作者
BUEKENS, P
ALEXANDER, S
BOUTSEN, M
BLONDEL, B
KAMINSKI, M
REID, M
OLSEN, JS
BERBIK, I
MONAGHAN, J
PINTO, P
ARAUJO, MP
GONZALEZ, AG
DEMUYLDER, X
LEJEUNE, B
VANDERVELLEN, R
VEROUGSTRAETE, A
WESEL, S
BALDUR, B
HANSEN, T
RYAN, R
AMBROSINI, A
MANDRUZZATO, G
MERIALDI, A
MANGUINHAS, JMB
FEITINHA, F
CRUZ, JM
DOSSANTOS, LN
PIERONI, B
RAMONEDA, VCI
ALMENDRAL, JLC
EZCURDIA, M
NALDA, AH
CALPARSORO, MU
GRIPPA, J
SOUMENKOFF, G
机构
[1] INSERM,EPIDEMIOL RES UNIT WOMEN & CHILD HLTH,PARIS,FRANCE
[2] UNIV GLASGOW,DEPT PUBL HLTH,GLASGOW,SCOTLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(94)92825-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Preterm delivery is strongly associated with neonatal mortality and morbidity. In some European countries, cervical examinations are used routinely during pregnancy to identify women at risk of preterm delivery. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and secondary effects of these routine cervical examinations. We did a randomised controlled trial in seven European countries, comparing two policies-namely, an attempt to do a cervical examination at every prenatal visit (2803 women) and avoidance of cervical examination if possible (2799). The median number of cervical examinations was 6 in the experimental group and 1 in the controls. There were 6.7% preterm (<37 weeks) deliveries in the experimental group and 6.4% in the control group (risk ratio 1.05 [95% confidence interval 0.85-1.29]; non-significant). The low birthweight rate was 6.6% in the experimental group and 7.7% in the controls (non-significant), Premature rupture of membranes was not significantly more frequent in the experimental group (27.1% vs 26.5%). Our findings do not support the routine use of cervical examinations during pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页码:841 / 844
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   PRETERM BIRTH PREVENTION - AN EVALUATION OF PROGRAMS IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
ALEXANDER, GR ;
WEISS, J ;
HULSEY, TC ;
PAPIERNIK, E .
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 1991, 18 (03) :160-169
[2]  
Altman, 1991, PRACTICAL STATICTS M
[3]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LENGTH OF GESTATION AND CERVICAL DILATATION, UTERINE CONTRACTILITY, AND OTHER FACTORS DURING PREGNANCY [J].
ANDERSON, AB ;
TURNBULL, AC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1969, 105 (08) :1207-&
[4]   RISKS OF ANTEPARTUM CERVICAL EXAMINATION IN MULTIFETAL GESTATIONS [J].
BIVINS, HA ;
NEWMAN, RB ;
ELLINGS, JM ;
HULSEY, TC ;
KEENAN, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1993, 169 (01) :22-25
[5]  
BLONDEL B, 1988, LANCET, V2, P846
[6]   PREDICTION OF PRETERM DELIVERY - IS IT SUBSTANTIALLY IMPROVED BY ROUTINE VAGINAL EXAMINATIONS [J].
BLONDEL, B ;
LECOUTOUR, X ;
KAMINSKI, M ;
CHAVIGNY, C ;
BREART, G ;
SUREAU, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 162 (04) :1042-1048
[7]  
BOUYER J, 1986, OBSTET GYNECOL, V68, P209
[8]   WARNING SYMPTOMS, UTERINE CONTRACTIONS, AND CERVICAL EXAMINATION FINDINGS IN WOMEN AT RISK OF PRETERM DELIVERY [J].
COPPER, RL ;
GOLDENBERG, RL ;
DAVIS, RO ;
CUTTER, GR ;
DUBARD, MB ;
CORLISS, DK ;
ANDREWS, JB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 162 (03) :748-754
[9]  
HERINGA M, 1988, EUR J OBSTET GYN R B, V28, P7
[10]   EVALUATION OF THE WEEKLY CERVICAL EXAMINATION IN A PRETERM BIRTH PREVENTION PROGRAM [J].
HOLBROOK, RH ;
FALCON, J ;
HERRON, M ;
LIRETTE, M ;
LAROS, RK ;
CREASY, RK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 1987, 4 (03) :240-244