A COMPARISON OF MICROSCREW AND SUTURE FIXATION FOR POROUS HIGH-DENSITY POLYETHYLENE ORBITAL FLOOR IMPLANTS

被引：20

作者：

HAUG, RH

KIMBERLY, D

BRADRICK, JP

机构：

[1] CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT SURG,CLEVELAND,OH 44106

[2] CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIV,SCH DENT,CLEVELAND,OH 44106

来源：

JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY | 1993年 / 51卷 / 11期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80292-7

中图分类号：

R78 [口腔科学];

学科分类号：

1003 ;

摘要：

Twenty oral and maxillofacial surgeons compared the surgical features of a microscrew fixation technique with a suture technique for fixation of porous high-density polyethylene orbital floor implants. One investigator then compared material features of these two fixation techniques using recently procured bovine ribs. The microscrew technique was found to be quicker (P > .01) and easier (P > .001), and it provided a higher quality of fixation (P > .001) than the suture technique. The microscrew/implant system had a greater pullout strength (P > .001) and shear strength (P > .001) than the suture/implant system. © 1993, American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. All rights reserved.. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：1217 / 1220

页数：4

共 9 条

[1] LONG-TERM STABILITY OF TEFLON ORBITAL IMPLANTS [J].

ARONOWITZ, JA ;

FREEMAN, BS ;

SPIRA, M .

PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1986, 78 (02) :166-173

[2]

BERGHAUS A, 1985, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V111, P154

[3] ALLOPLAST MATERIALS IN ORBITAL REPAIR [J].

BROWNING, CW .

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1967, 63 (5P1) :955-+

[4]

ELLIS E, 1991, ORAL MAXILLOFACIAL T, P484

[5]

Lang W, 1889, T OPHTHAL SOC UK, V9, P43

[6]

RANKOW RM, 1975, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V101, P19

[7]

ROMANO JJ, 1990, 1990 INT S PLAST SUR

[8]

RUBIN LR, 1983, BIOMATERIALS RECONST, P474

[9]

WILLIAMS DF, BIOCOMPATIBILITY CLI, V1, P9

← 1 →