CLINICAL COMPARISON OF MAPHENIDE AND SILER SULFADIAZINE

被引：16

作者：

PEGG, SP

RAMSAY, K

MELDRUM, L

LAUNDY, M

机构：

[1] Burns Unit, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, QLD

来源：

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY | 1979年 / 13卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.3109/02844317909013031

中图分类号：

R61 [外科手术学];

学科分类号：

摘要：

A series of 645 consecutive burn injuries are analysed. There were 175 patients in the control group. 156 in the Maphenide (Sulfamylon) group and 314 in the Silver Sulphadiazine (S. S. D.) group. The Maphenide group and S. S. D. group are compared statistically with the control group. S. S. D. proved superior in relation to clinical infection rate and culture rate in reduction of Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus. Other culture rates were analysed. There were significant reductions in both groups for E. coli and Candida albicans. Pneumonias were significantly increased in both groups and the mortality rate reduced with S. S. D. Overall S. S. D. gave better results than Maphenide. © 1979 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted.

引用

页码：95 / 101

页数：7

共 10 条

[1] DRUG-RESISTANCE IN RELATION TO USE OF SILVER SULFADIAZINE CREAM IN A BURNS UNIT [J].