CORRELATION OF HISTOPATHOLOGIC FINDINGS WITH CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ASSESSMENTS OF CERVICAL LYMPH-NODE METASTASES IN ORAL-CANCER

被引:72
作者
WOOLGAR, JA
BEIRNE, JC
VAUGHAN, ED
LEWISJONES, HG
SCOTT, J
BROWN, JS
机构
[1] WALTON HOSP,REG CTR MAXILLOFACIAL SURG,LIVERPOOL,MERSEYSIDE,ENGLAND
[2] WALTON HOSP,DIAGNOST RADIOL UNIT,LIVERPOOL,MERSEYSIDE,ENGLAND
关键词
CERVICAL NODE METASTASIS; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80853-7
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The accuracy of preoperative diagnosis of cervical lymph-node metastasis in oral cancer was assessed by comparing the histopathologic findings in 136 sides of neck dissection with physical examination under anaesthesia (EUA) and computerized tomography (CT) assessments of the metastatic status. The overall accuracy of EUA and CT assessments was 72% and 73%, respectively, and a combination of both methods resulted in sensitivity and specificity rates of 55% and 78%, respectively. Twenty-three of the 51 histologically positive necks had been assessed as negative on both EUA and CT. Six of these contained only micrometastases, and in another 10, the largest positive node was 1.5 cm or less. Extracapsular spread of metastatic carcinoma was found in 12 of the 23 EUA and CT false-negative dissections. Most of the 21 histologically positive necks which had been correctly assessed as positive on both EUA and CT contained enlarged metastatic nodes, fused nodal masses, extensive extracapsular spread, or more than one of these features. Three of the 85 histologically negative necks had been assessed as positive on both EUA and CT; eight had been positive on EUA alone, and another eight on CT alone. Reactive nodal hyperplasia or sialadenitis was seen in most false-positive dissections. We conclude that the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis of metastasis by routine methods remains poor, and that EUA and CT are reliable only in patients with bulky metastatic deposits.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 37
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Altman DG, 1991, PRACTICAL STAT MED R, P229, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429258589
[2]  
Beahrs OH, 1988, MANUAL STAGING CANCE, P27
[3]   RATIONALE FOR ELECTIVE MODIFIED NECK DISSECTION [J].
BYERS, RM ;
WOLF, PF ;
BALLANTYNE, AJ .
HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1988, 10 (03) :160-167
[4]  
CACHIN Y, 1979, OTOLARYNG CLIN N AM, V12, P145
[5]   COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF REGIONAL LYMPH-NODE INVOLVEMENT IN CANCER OF THE ORAL CAVITY AND OROPHARYNX [J].
CLOSE, LG ;
MERKEL, M ;
VUITCH, MF ;
REISCH, J ;
SCHAEFER, SD .
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 1989, 11 (04) :309-317
[6]  
Feind CR, 1972, LYMPHATICS CANC, P59
[7]   ROLE OF MODERN IMAGING IN DECISION-MAKING FOR ELECTIVE NECK DISSECTION [J].
FEINMESSER, R ;
FREEMAN, JL ;
FEINMESSER, M ;
NOYEK, A ;
MULLEN, JBM .
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 1992, 14 (03) :173-176
[8]  
FEINMESSER R, 1987, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V113, P1307
[9]  
FRIEDMAN M, 1990, LARYNGOSCOPE, V100, P54
[10]  
FRIEDMAN M, 1984, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V110, P443