AUTOMATA SIMULATION OF N-PERSON SOCIAL DILEMMA GAMES

被引:11
作者
AKIMOV, V
SOUTCHANSKI, M
机构
[1] USA and Canada Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0022002794038001007
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Collective behavior of N players in a social dilemma game is simulated by automata exhibiting cooperative behavior. In his models of simple biological systems, Tsetlin assumed minimum information available to the players. The automata in this study were somewhat more sophisticated, using Markov strategies in their interactions. The authors investigated relationships between information received by the automata and the emergence of cooperation in a simulated evolution process. In some ways, this approach is similar to that of Axelrod. However, instead of determining the most successful strategy, the authors seek surviving strategies in a social dilemma environment. Previous results showed that cooperation could be established asymptotically under partially centralized control. In this model there is no such control. The main result is that more sophisticated behavior of self-seeking automata compensates for the absence of such control. Moreover, cooperation is established more rapidly when more information is available to the automata.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 148
页数:11
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
ALKER HR, 1981, RESOLVING PRISONERS
[2]  
Axelrod R., 1984, EVOLUTION COOPERATIO
[3]  
Dawes R. M., 1975, HUMAN JUDGMENT DECIS
[4]  
GURVICH ET, 1975, AUTOMAT REM CONTR+, V36, P257
[5]   N-PERSON PRISONERS DILEMMA [J].
HAMBURGER, H .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL SOCIOLOGY, 1973, 3 (01) :27-48
[6]   TRAGEDY OF COMMONS [J].
HARDIN, G .
SCIENCE, 1968, 162 (3859) :1243-+
[7]  
Moulin H, 1981, THEORIE JEUX EC POLI
[8]   EXPERIMENTING WITH THE ARMS-RACE [J].
PILISUK, M .
JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 1984, 28 (02) :296-315
[9]  
Rapoport A., 1965, PRISONERS DILEMMA
[10]  
ROBBINS HA, 1956, P NATIONAL ACADEMY S, V42, P3