MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE COMPOSTING - POLICY AND REGULATION

被引:18
作者
HARRISON, EZ
RICHARD, TL
机构
[1] Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca
关键词
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; COMPOST; STANDARDS; REGULATION; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/0961-9534(92)90022-I
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) composting is a rapidly evolving technology, and as such is subject to shifting policies and changing regulations. Composting is a viable way of recycling organic wastes which comprise a large fraction of the municipal solid waste stream, but there is debate about whether compost inputs should be restricted to source separated "biowastes" or whether centralized processsing of mixed solid waste is acceptable. Several additional key policy issues include: how MSW composting fits into an integrated waste management system; compost quality standards and restrictions on compost utilization; facility siting, design, and operation; and regulatory enforcement. As with other policies and regulations, those related to MSW composting are influenced by a combination of science, economics, and philosophy a, mediated by the political process. Current MSW compost regulations in North America and Europe provide examples of widely differing policy frameworks and the standards and criteria which result. Risk-based assessments drive compost standards in the United States, while a policy of "no net degradation" of existing soil quality is the basis for standards in parts of Europe and Canada. These different policies result in large differences in the allowable levels of some heavy metals. Unrestricted use of "clean" composts meeting quality standards is generally allowed under all regulations, but restrictions on the use of composts which may contain levels of one or more contaminant that exceed those standards vary. The underlying differences between these frameworks are described, and important uncertainties which research can help resolve are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 143
页数:17
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
U.S. EPA, Solid waste dilemma: An agenda for action, EPA/530-SW-89-019, (1989)
[2]  
Guelph, City of Guelph, Wet/dry pilot project: Summary of preliminary findings, (1991)
[3]  
Center for the Biology of Natural Systems, Development and pilot test of an intensive municipal solid waste recylcing system for the town of East Hampton, (1990)
[4]  
U.S. EPA, Characterization of municipal solid waste in the United States: 1990 update, EPA/530-SE-90-042, (1990)
[5]  
Epstein, Compost quality—A public health perspective, Solid waste composting council proceedings of 1991 national conference, (1991)
[6]  
U.S. Congress, Office of Technological Assessment, Facing America's trash: What next for municipal solid waste, OTA-O-424, (1989)
[7]  
Ham, Sanitary landfill: Proactive or reactive?, Waste Age, 23, 2, (1992)
[8]  
Harrison, Landfill issues, National cooperative extension service solid and hazardous waste management workshop proceedings, (1989)
[9]  
Reijenga, Separate collection of compostables, BioCycle, 30, 7, pp. 62-64, (1989)
[10]  
Mayer, Hofer, Maire, Trends in yard waste composting, BioCycle, 29, 7, pp. 60-62, (1988)