OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF IMAGE QUALITY .2. FISHER INFORMATION, FOURIER CROSSTALK, AND FIGURES OF MERIT FOR TASK-PERFORMANCE

被引:195
作者
BARRETT, HH
DENNY, JL
WAGNER, RF
MYERS, KJ
机构
[1] UNIV ARIZONA,CTR OPT SCI,TUCSON,AZ 85724
[2] UNIV ARIZONA,DEPT MATH,TUCSON,AZ 85724
[3] US FDA,CTR DEVICES & RADIOL HLTH,ROCKVILLE,MD 20852
来源
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION | 1995年 / 12卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1364/JOSAA.12.000834
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Figures of merit for image quality are derived on the basis of the performance of mathematical observers on specific detection and estimation tasks. The tasks include detection of a known signal superimposed on a known background, detection of a known signal on a random background, estimation of Fourier coefficients of the object, and estimation of the integral of the object over a specified region of interest. The chosen observer for the detection tasks is the ideal linear discriminant, which we call the Hotelling observer. The figures of merit are based on the Fisher information matrix relevant to estimation of the Fourier coefficients and the closely related Fourier crosstalk matrix introduced earlier by Barrett and Gifford [Phys. Med. Biol. 39, 451 (1994)]. A finite submatrix of the infinite Fisher information matrix is used to set Cramer-Rao lower bounds on the variances of the estimates of the first N Fourier coefficients. The figures of merit for detection tasks are shown to be closely related to the concepts of noise-equivalent quanta (NEQ) and generalized NEQ, originally derived for linear, shift-invariant imaging systems and stationary noise, Application of these results to the design of imaging systems is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:834 / 852
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] NUMERICAL APPLICATIONS OF A FORMALISM FOR GEOPHYSICAL INVERSE PROBLEMS
    BACKUS, GE
    GILBERT, JF
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1967, 13 (1-3): : 247 - &
  • [2] CONE-BEAM TOMOGRAPHY WITH DISCRETE-DATA SETS
    BARRETT, HH
    GIFFORD, H
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 39 (03) : 451 - 476
  • [3] LINEAR DISCRIMINANTS AND IMAGE QUALITY
    BARRETT, HH
    GOOLEY, T
    GIRODIAS, K
    ROLLAND, J
    WHITE, T
    YAO, J
    [J]. IMAGE AND VISION COMPUTING, 1992, 10 (06) : 451 - 460
  • [4] MODEL OBSERVERS FOR ASSESSMENT OF IMAGE QUALITY
    BARRETT, HH
    YAO, J
    ROLLAND, JP
    MYERS, KJ
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1993, 90 (21) : 9758 - 9765
  • [5] OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF IMAGE QUALITY - EFFECTS OF QUANTUM NOISE AND OBJECT VARIABILITY
    BARRETT, HH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1990, 7 (07): : 1266 - 1278
  • [6] BARRETT HH, 1994, THEORY PHYS MED BIOL, V39, P833
  • [7] BARRETT HH, 1989, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V1090, P176
  • [8] LINEAR INVERSE PROBLEMS WITH DISCRETE-DATA .1. GENERAL FORMULATION AND SINGULAR SYSTEM-ANALYSIS
    BERTERO, M
    DEMOL, C
    PIKE, ER
    [J]. INVERSE PROBLEMS, 1985, 1 (04) : 301 - 330
  • [9] EFFICIENCY OF HUMAN VISUAL SIGNAL DISCRIMINATION
    BURGESS, AE
    WAGNER, RF
    JENNINGS, RJ
    BARLOW, HB
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1981, 214 (4516) : 93 - 94
  • [10] Dainty J. C., 1974, IMAGE SCI