PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF SURFACE HYDROPHILIZED NOVEL ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES USING AQUEOUS PROTEINS

被引:44
作者
KIM, KJ
FANE, AG
机构
[1] UNESCO Centre for Membrane Science and Technology, School of Chemical Engineering and Industrial Chemistry, University of New South Wales, Sydney
关键词
MEMBRANE EVALUATION; CLEANING; ULTRAFILTRATION; PROTEIN DEPOSITION; FOULING; CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/0376-7388(94)00215-K
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The performance of four commercial ultrafiltration membranes with the same nominal molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) but with different surface hydrophilicity was compared with attention to flux, water flux recovery after cleaning, protein deposition as a function of pH, pressure, and ionic strength using 0.1 wt% aqueous bovine albumine solution. The membranes modified for greater hydrophilicity (Biomax, OMEGA) resulted in enhanced UF flux with slower flux loss and lower solute resistance in comparison with unmodified membranes (PFGC, NOVA) at all experimental conditions tested (salt, pH, pressure) with similar protein retention. The results also indicate that this hydrophilic character is related to the flux decline. However, these hydrophilic membranes were not necessarily easier to clean. The intrinsic properties of the membrane surface such as surface charge, hydrophobicity appear to determine the first layer of protein deposition which is difficult to remove. Proteins deposited at low pressure were more difficult to remove by chemical cleaning than those at higher pressure, presumably due to differences in adsorption configuration (i.e. multi-point adsorption at low pressure) at the membrane surface. Differences in initial membrane flux ranging 222-620 l/m2h had little effect on final flux during protein UF under hydrodynamic conditions used in this work.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 162
页数:14
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   INTERFACIAL EFFECTS WITH MICRO-FILTRATION MEMBRANES [J].
BAUSER, H ;
CHMIEL, H ;
STROH, N ;
WALITZA, E .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1982, 11 (03) :321-332
[2]   MOLECULAR-ORIENTATION OF AQUEOUS SURFACTANTS ON A HYDROPHOBIC SOLID [J].
BISIO, PD ;
CARTLEDGE, JG ;
KEESOM, WH ;
RADKE, CJ .
JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 1980, 78 (01) :225-234
[3]  
CABASSO I, 1980, ULTRAFILTRATION MEMB, P57
[4]   THE USE OF ANIONIC SURFACTANTS FOR REDUCING FOULING OF ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES - THEIR EFFECTS AND OPTIMIZATION [J].
CHEN, V ;
FANE, AG ;
FELL, CJD .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1992, 67 (2-3) :249-261
[5]   ADSORPTION OF SERUM-PROTEINS ON POLYMER MEMBRANE SURFACES [J].
DILLMAN, WJ ;
MILLER, IF .
JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 1973, 44 (02) :221-241
[6]  
Fane A.G., 1987, WORKSH CHAR ULTR MEM, P39
[7]   THE EFFECT OF SURFACTANT PRETREATMENT ON THE ULTRAFILTRATION OF PROTEINS [J].
FANE, AG ;
FELL, CJD ;
KIM, KJ .
DESALINATION, 1985, 53 (1-3) :37-55
[8]   THE EFFECT OF PH AND IONIC ENVIRONMENT ON THE ULTRAFILTRATION OF PROTEIN SOLUTIONS WITH RETENTIVE MEMBRANES [J].
FANE, AG ;
FELL, CJD ;
SUKI, A .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1983, 16 (DEC) :195-210
[9]  
Foster J.F., 1960, PLASMA PROTEINS, V1, P179
[10]   LINEAR LOWRY-FOLIN ASSAY FOR BOTH WATER-SOLUBLE AND SODIUM DODECYL SULFATE-SOLUBILIZED PROTEINS [J].
HESS, HH ;
LEES, MB ;
DERR, JE .
ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1978, 85 (01) :295-300