OPTICAL-PERFORMANCE OF MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENSES

被引:155
作者
HOLLADAY, JT
VANDIJK, H
LANG, A
PORTNEY, V
WILLIS, TR
SUN, R
OKSMAN, HC
机构
[1] University of Texas Medical School, Department of Ophthalmology, Hermann Eye Center, Houston, Texas
[2] Allergan Medical Optics Research Facility, Irvine, California
关键词
modulation transfer function; monofocal intraocular lens; multifocal intraocular lens; resolution efficiency; through focus response;
D O I
10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80793-6
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
The optical performance of one monofocal and five multifocal lenses was evaluated in the laboratory and photographically. The laboratory testing included determination of the modulation transfer function (INITF), through focus response (TFR), resolution efficiency, and Strehl ratio of each lens. The photographic testing included photographs of the Regan high contrast acuity chart at ten feet with clearest focus and 18 additional photographs in which the image was defocused using minus trial lenses in 0.25 diopter increments. A color photograph of the Kodak color chart was also taken using each lens. All testing was conducted using a 3 mm artificial pupil under ideal implant conditions with no decentration or tilt. The laboratory and photographic results demonstrate that all the multifocal lenses had a two- to three-fold increase in the depth of field with at least a 50% lower contrast in the retinal image. The photographic testing revealed aone to two line better resolution limit with the monofocal lens, which corresponded to the 12% to 41% better MTF cut-off value with the monofocal lens by laboratory testing. The measured resolution efficiencies of all six lenses were comparable. The color photographs revealed color mixing of adjacent colors vvith the multifocal lenses, whereas the colors appeared unchanged from the original with the monofocal lens. © 1990, American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 422
页数:10
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Stark WJ, Worthen DM, Holladay JT, Et al., The FDA report on intraocular lenses, Ophthalmology, 90, pp. 311-317, (1983)
[2]  
Nakazawa M, Ohtsuki K, Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses, Am J Ophthalmol, 96, pp. 435-438, (1983)
[3]  
Nakazawa M, Ohtsuki K, Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber lenses: optical analysis, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 25, pp. 1458-1460, (1984)
[4]  
Boerner CF, Thrasher BH, Results of monovision correction in bilateral pseudophakes, Am Intra-Ocular Implant Soc J, 10, pp. 49-50, (1984)
[5]  
Huber C, Planned myopic astigmatism as a substitute for accommodation in pseudophakia, Am Intra-Ocular Implant Soc J, 7, pp. 244-249, (1981)
[6]  
Smith WJ, Modern Optical Engineering, (1966)
[7]  
Holladay JT, Ting AC, Koester CJ, Et al., Intraocular lens resolution in air and water, J Cataract Refract Surg, 13, pp. 511-517, (1987)
[8]  
Holladay JT, Ting AC, Koester CJ, Et al., Silicone intraocular lens resolution in air and in water, J Cataract Refract Surg, 14, pp. 657-659, (1988)
[9]  
Regan D, Neima D, Low-contrast letter charts as a test of visual function, Ophthalmology, 90, pp. 1192-1200, (1983)
[10]  
Legge GE, Rubin GS, Luebker A, Psychophysics of reading-V, The role of contrast in normal vision. Vision Res, 27, pp. 1165-1177, (1987)