ACOUSTICS AS A TOOL FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF GREAT-LAKES FORAGE FISHES

被引:33
作者
ARGYLE, RL
机构
[1] US Fish and Wildlife Service, National Fisheries Research Center - Great Lakes, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0165-7836(92)90052-U
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Sharp reductions in forage fish populations in Lake Michigan have raised concerns about the continued ability of the forage stocks to support large populations Of lake trout Salvelinus namaycush and other salmonid predators. There was a need for a more comprehensive and accurate assessment of forage fish abundance and distribution to evaluate these concerns. In response. cooperative diel surveys of the Lake Michigan forage species were conducted in late summer 1987 and spring 1989 with acoustics, midwater and bottom trawls. In late summer 1987, the acoustic estimate (night) of the midwater standing stock of alewives Alosa pseudoharangus, rainbow smelt Osmerus mordax, and bloaters Coregonus hoyi was 366 900 +/- 73 600 (95% CI) t. In comparison, bottom-trawl catches estimated the stocks at 235 500 t (day) and only 23 500 t (night). In spring 1989, the acoustic estimate was 435 000 +/- 110 000 t and the bottom-trawl estimates were 269 300 t (day) and 25 400 t (night). The composition of the stock (by weight) was similar both years; bloaters dominated the catches with alewives and smelt represented in roughly equal proportions. The target strength-length (cm) relationship, TS = 18.2 log10(L)-67.5, was determined for rainbow smelt, based on midwater trawling data. As most of the fish caught in midwater were rainbow smelt, the equation was nol representative of the mixed-species population so the average backscattering cross-section per unit weight was used to scale the echo-integrator for biomass computations. Data from the acoustic surveys appeared to provide a more accurate estimate of the size of the mixed-species populations in Lake Michigan than did the trawl catches.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 196
页数:18
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Argyle, Alewives and rainbow smelt in Lake Huron Midwater and bottom aggregations and estimates of standing stocks, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 111, pp. 267-285, (1982)
[2]  
Berst, Spangler, Lake Huron effects of exploitation introductions and eutrophication on the salmonid community, Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 29, pp. 877-887, (1972)
[3]  
Brown, Population biology of alewives Alosa pseudoharengus in Lake Michigan 1949–1970, Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 29, pp. 477-500, (1972)
[4]  
Brown, Argyle, Payne, Holey, Yield and dynamics of destabilized chub Coregonus spp. populations in Lakes Michigan and Huron, 1950–1984, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 44, pp. 371-383, (1987)
[5]  
Buerkle, Estimation of fish length from acoustic target strengths, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 44, pp. 1782-1785, (1987)
[6]  
Eurczynski, Michaletz, Marrone, Hydroacoustic assessment of the abundance and distribution of rainbow smelt in Lake Oahe, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 7, pp. 106-116, (1987)
[7]  
Christie, Lake Ontario effects of exploitation introductions and eutrophication on the salmonid community, Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 29, pp. 913-929, (1972)
[8]  
Eck, Brown, Lake Michigan's capacity to support lake trout Salvelinus namaycush and other salmonines: an estimate based on the status of prey populations in the 1970s, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 42, pp. 449-454, (1985)
[9]  
Hatch, Haack, Brown, Estimation of alewife biomass in Lake Michigan 1967–1978, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 110, pp. 575-584, (1981)
[10]  
Hartman, Lake Erie effects of exploitation environmental changes and new species on the fishery resources, Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 29, pp. 899-912, (1972)