CIRCADIAN CHARACTERISTICS OF DJUNGARIAN HAMSTERS - EFFECTS OF PHOTOPERIODIC PRETREATMENT AND ARTIFICIAL SELECTION

Bidirectional artificial selection for (High Line) and against (Low Line) photoresponsiveness altered the percent of photoresponsive hamsters within lines and affected circadian function of hamsters identical in photoresponsiveness. For example, free-running period was shorter in responsive relative to non-responsive hamsters. Between-line differences for responders and nonresponders were also found: hamsters from the High Line had a shorter free-running period relative to Low Line hamsters. However, phase angle of entrainment to long and short days was not affected. In general, expression of circadian rhythmicity was extraordinarily inflexible in photononresponsive hamsters from both lines: 1) phase angle of entrainment to lights on was similar under short and long day; 2) activity duration was similar under long and short days, although some decompression occurred in constant dark; 3) aftereffects on the free-running period were absent; and 4) amplitude of the phase-response curve was small (+/- 1h) and present only at circadian times 10-24. We propose that selection for or against photoresponsiveness may have affected the interaction of component oscillators underlying circadian rhythmicity.