BASE-LINE RISK AND PREFERENCE FOR REDUCTIONS IN RISK-TO-LIFE

被引:12
作者
HOROWITZ, JK [1 ]
CARSON, RT [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF SAN DIEGO,DEPT ECON,LA JOLLA,CA 92093
关键词
BASE-LINE RISK; CONSUMER ATTITUDES; RANK-ORDERED LOGIT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb00746.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The typical model of individual attitudes toward risk-to-life suggests that an individual's willingness to pay for a reduction in mortality risk increases with the baseline risk. The higher-baseline hypothesis has been the subject of several empirical tests but results have so far been mixed. Using survey evidence, we present a situation in which subjects do prefer to reduce risks for which the baseline is higher. This finding is robust to several alternative explanations. Survey responses reflect subjects' concerns about government effectiveness in risk reduction, environmental effects associated with the various hazards, and other idiosyncratic elements of the risks; however, these concerns appear to occur in addition to, not in lieu of, the preference to reduce higher risks.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 462
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
BEGGS S, 1981, J ECONOMETRICS, V16, P1
[2]   RISK AND BENEFIT PERCEPTIONS, ACCEPTABILITY JUDGMENTS, AND SELF-REPORTED ACTIONS TOWARD NUCLEAR-POWER [J].
GARDNER, GT ;
TIEMANN, AR ;
GOULD, LC ;
DELUCA, DR ;
DOOB, LW ;
STOLWIJK, JAJ .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 116 (02) :179-197
[3]  
GEGAX D, 1985, PERCEIVED RISK MARGI
[4]  
HOROWITZ J, 1993, ANAL RISK LIFE
[5]  
JONESLEE M, 1974, J POLIT ECON, V82, P835, DOI 10.1086/260238
[6]  
Slovic P., 1985, PERILOUS PROGR MANAG, P91
[7]   AN EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS OF THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF RISK CHANGES [J].
SMITH, VK ;
DESVOUSGES, WH .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1987, 95 (01) :89-114
[8]  
Viscusi W.Kip., 1989, J RISK UNCERTAINTY, V2, P235, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00209389
[9]  
VISCUSI WK, 1990, AM ECON REV, V80, P353
[10]   THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF CHANGING MORTALITY PROBABILITIES - A DECISION-THEORETIC APPROACH [J].
WEINSTEIN, MC ;
SHEPARD, DS ;
PLISKIN, JS .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1980, 94 (02) :373-396