THE PERCEPTION OF A DEPTH INTERVAL WITH BINOCULAR DISPARITY CUES

[1] GILINSKY A S, 1955, Am J Psychol, V68, P476, DOI 10.2307/1418537

[2] PERCEIVED SIZE AND DISTANCE IN VISUAL SPACE [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1951, 58 (06) : 460 - 482

[3] THE PERCEPTION OF SHAPE FROM BINOCULAR DISPARITY CUES [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1960, 50 (01) : 179 - 192

[4] THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SIZE CUES TO RELATIVE DISTANCE AS A FUNCTION OF LATERAL VISUAL SEPARATION [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1955, 50 (05): : 309 - 315

[5] GOGEL WC, 1958, 331 US ARM MED RES L, P1

[6] GOGEL WC, 1960, J PSYCHOL, V49, P119

[7] THE RELATION OF PERCEIVED SIZE TO PERCEIVED DISTANCE [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1954, 67 (03) : 411 - 426

[8] THE SIZE-DISTANCE PARADOX - A REPLY TO GILINSKY [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1956, 69 (03) : 469 - 476

[9] Hardy L. H., 1953, GEOMETRY BINOCULAR S

[10] Luneburg R. K., 1947, MATH ANAL BINOCULAR

[1] GILINSKY A S, 1955, Am J Psychol, V68, P476, DOI 10.2307/1418537

[2] PERCEIVED SIZE AND DISTANCE IN VISUAL SPACE [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1951, 58 (06) : 460 - 482

[3] THE PERCEPTION OF SHAPE FROM BINOCULAR DISPARITY CUES [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1960, 50 (01) : 179 - 192

[4] THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SIZE CUES TO RELATIVE DISTANCE AS A FUNCTION OF LATERAL VISUAL SEPARATION [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1955, 50 (05): : 309 - 315

[5] GOGEL WC, 1958, 331 US ARM MED RES L, P1

[6] GOGEL WC, 1960, J PSYCHOL, V49, P119

[7] THE RELATION OF PERCEIVED SIZE TO PERCEIVED DISTANCE [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1954, 67 (03) : 411 - 426

[8] THE SIZE-DISTANCE PARADOX - A REPLY TO GILINSKY [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1956, 69 (03) : 469 - 476

[9] Hardy L. H., 1953, GEOMETRY BINOCULAR S

[10] Luneburg R. K., 1947, MATH ANAL BINOCULAR