DIFFERENCES AMONG SIBLING SPECIES RHAGOLETIS-MENDAX AND R-POMONELLA (DIPTERA, TEPHRITIDAE) IN THEIR ANTENNAL SENSITIVITY TO HOST FRUIT COMPOUNDS

被引:10
作者
FREY, JE
BIERBAUM, TJ
BUSH, GL
机构
[1] MICHIGAN STATE UNIV,DEPT ZOOL,E LANSING,MI 48824
[2] MICHIGAN STATE UNIV,DEPT ENTOMOL,E LANSING,MI 48824
关键词
ELECTROANTENNOGRAM; GC SPLITTER; RHAGOLETIS-POMONELLA; RHAGOLETIS-MENDAX; DIPTERA; TEPHRITIDAE; SIBLING SPECIES; ANTENNAL SENSITIVITY DIFFERENCES; HOST ODOR COMPOUNDS; HOST-PLANT RECOGNITION; SPECIATION;
D O I
10.1007/BF00981924
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Prior electrophoretic and morphological studies have identified two closely related, economically important tephritid flies, R. mendax (Curran) and R. pomonella (Walsh), which infest the fruits of ericaceous and rosaceous plants, respectively. Further studies also have shown consistent differences among these species in their ovipositional preferences for apples and highbush blueberries and have determined that their ovipositional behavior is elicited by extracts obtained from these fruits. In this paper we report the results of an experiment that tested whether these species show distinct electroantennogram (EAG) responses to a large array of compounds present in gas chromatograph-fractionated pentane extracts of apples and highbush blueberries. R. mendax and R. pomonella flies were found to have significant differences in their antennal sensitivity to 11 blueberry and nine apple extract peaks, which correspond to 24.4% of all blueberry and 25.0% of all apple peaks that elicited a measurable EAG response from either species. Interspecific differences in peripheral sensitivity were more pronounced for blueberry than apple extract; R. pomonella flies were most sensitive to blueberry compounds with low retention times, whereas R. mendax flies responded to blueberry compounds with a broader range of retention times. Both species were most sensitive to apple peaks with high retention times. The retention times of most apple and blueberry peaks that elicited EAG responses from R. mendax and R. pomonella flies were different from the retention times of seven attractant fruit esters that were previously identified by Fein et al. (1982). The identification of these unknown apple and blueberry compounds could lead to the discovery of new chemical cues that mediate the host-plant preferences of these sibling species.
引用
收藏
页码:2011 / 2024
页数:14
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   A GENE AFFECTING THE SPECIFICITY OF THE CHEMOSENSORY NEURONS OF DROSOPHILA [J].
ARORA, K ;
RODRIGUES, V ;
JOSHI, S ;
SHANBHAG, S ;
SIDDIQI, O .
NATURE, 1987, 330 (6143) :62-63
[2]  
AVERILL AL, 1988, ENTOMOL EXP APPL, V47, P211, DOI 10.1007/BF00352207
[3]   ELECTROPHORETIC KEY FOR DISTINGUISHING SPECIES OF THE GENUS RHAGOLETIS (DIPTERA, TEPHRITIDAE) AS LARVAE, PUPAE, OR ADULTS [J].
BERLOCHER, SH .
ANNALS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1980, 73 (02) :131-137
[4]  
BIERBAUM TJ, 1990, ENTOMOL EXP APPL, V55, P105, DOI 10.1007/BF00352571
[5]  
BIERBAUM TJ, 1990, ENTOMOL EXP APPL, V56, P165, DOI 10.1007/BF00163459
[6]  
BIERBAUM TJ, 1987, INSECTS PLANTS, P374
[7]   MODES OF ANIMAL SPECIATION [J].
BUSH, GL .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1975, 6 :339-364
[8]  
BUSH GUY L., 1966, BULL MUS COMP ZOOL HARVARD UNIV, V134, P431
[9]   HOST-SELECTION BEHAVIOR DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE FRUIT-FLY SIBLING SPECIES RHAGOLETIS-POMONELLA AND RHAGOLETIS-MENDAX (DIPTERA, TEPHRITIDAE) [J].
DIEHL, SR ;
PROKOPY, RJ .
ANNALS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1986, 79 (01) :266-271
[10]  
FALK R, 1974, NATURE, V254, P325