THE MALLEABILITY OF EYEWITNESS CONFIDENCE - CO-WITNESS AND PERSEVERANCE EFFECTS

被引:159
作者
LUUS, CAE [1 ]
WELLS, GL [1 ]
机构
[1] IOWA STATE UNIV SCI & TECHNOL, DEPT PSYCHOL, AMES, IA 50011 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.714
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
A theft was staged 70 times for pairs of eyewitnesses (N = 140) who then made a photo-lineup identification. Witnesses then received 1 of 9 types of information regarding the alleged identification decision of their co-witness. Witnesses told that their co-witness identified the same person whom they had identified showed an increase in the confidence they expressed to a confederate police officer. Confidence deflation occurred among witnesses who thought their co-witness either identified another person or had stated that the thief was not in the lineup. Initial co-witness information was not mitigated by subsequent changes to that information. A second study showed videotapes of these witnesses' testimonies to observers (n = 378) whose credibility ratings of the testimony paralleled the witnesses' self-rated confidence. Eyewitness identification confidence is highly malleable after the identification has been made despite the fact that physical resemblance between the culprit and person identified has not changed.
引用
收藏
页码:714 / 723
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   IMPACT OF GROUP CONSENSUS AND SOCIAL SUPPORT ON STIMULUS MEANING - MEDIATION OF CONFORMITY BY COGNITIVE RESTRUCTURING [J].
ALLEN, VL ;
WILDER, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 39 (06) :1116-1124
[2]   OPINIONS AND SOCIAL PRESSURE [J].
ASCH, SE .
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1955, 193 (05) :31-35
[3]   CORRELATION OF EYEWITNESS ACCURACY AND CONFIDENCE - OPTIMALITY HYPOTHESIS REVISITED [J].
BOTHWELL, RK ;
BRIGHAM, JC ;
DEFFENBACHER, KA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 72 (04) :691-695
[4]   THE ABILITY OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS TO ESTIMATE THE ACCURACY OF EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATIONS [J].
BRIGHAM, JC ;
BOTHWELL, RK .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1983, 7 (01) :19-30
[5]  
Fischoff B., 1982, JUDGMENT UNCERTAINTY, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511809477.032
[6]   THE IMPACT OF GENERAL VERSUS SPECIFIC EXPERT TESTIMONY AND EYEWITNESS CONFIDENCE UPON MOCK JUROR JUDGMENT [J].
FOX, SG ;
WALTERS, HA .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1986, 10 (03) :215-228
[7]  
Hastie R., 1978, JURIMETRICS J, V19, P1
[8]  
KIESLER CA, 1971, PSYCHOL COMMITMENT
[9]  
Leippe M. R., 1980, LAW HUMAN BEHAV, V4, P261, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF01040618, 10.1007/BF01040618]
[10]   REACTIONS TO CHILD (VERSUS ADULT) EYEWITNESSES - THE INFLUENCE OF JURORS PRECONCEPTIONS AND WITNESS BEHAVIOR [J].
LEIPPE, MR ;
ROMANCZYK, A .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1989, 13 (02) :103-132