3-DIMENSIONAL IMAGE-PROCESSING FOR MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF EPITHELIUM SECTIONS

被引:14
作者
ALBERT, R
SCHINDEWOLF, T
BAUMANN, I
HARMS, H
机构
[1] UNIV WURZBURG,INST VIROL & IMMUNOL,W-8700 WURZBURG,GERMANY
[2] UNIV WURZBURG,INST PATHOL,W-8700 WURZBURG,GERMANY
来源
CYTOMETRY | 1992年 / 13卷 / 07期
关键词
3D STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SQUAMOUS EPITHELIUM SECTIONS; DIFFERENTIATION OF STAGES; GRAPH THEORETICAL METHODS; AUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION;
D O I
10.1002/cyto.990130712
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The reproducible classification of poorly differentiated abnormal epithelium specimens is still a diagnostic problem. The computer-aided method described here improves the differentiation between benign and malignant epithelium specimens. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of normal squamous epithelium, dysplasia, carcinoma in situ, and carcinoma were scanned in a TV microscope system and analyzed by means of image processing methods on a DEC 5000/200 workstation. From the 15-20-mu-m thick histological sections, 3-5 focus positions in steps of 1-4-mu-m were scanned. The segmentation of the cell nuclei was performed automatically by color analysis and geometric operations. For each nucleus the best focus level was selected and at this level the center of the cell was calculated. Graph theoretical methods were applied to analyze the morphometry of the epithelium specimens. The minimal spanning tree was computed in the three-dimensional (3D) space of the sections with the selected centers of the nuclei as vertices. The best feature found for discrimination of the specimens is the average length of all edges in a tree. In the two-dimensional (2D) analysis we had to accept an error probability of about 20% in differentiation of dysplasia and carcinoma. In contrast to this we differentiated normal squamous epithelium, dysplasia, and carcinoma with a correct classification rate of 100% in the 3D analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:759 / 765
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   LEUKEMIA-RELATED MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES IN BLAST CELLS [J].
AUS, HM ;
HARMS, H ;
HAUCKE, M ;
BERITOVA, J ;
TERMEULEN, V ;
GUNZER, U ;
BAUMANN, I ;
ABMAYR, W .
CYTOMETRY, 1986, 7 (04) :365-370
[2]  
Breiman L, 2017, CLASSIFICATION REGRE, P368, DOI 10.1201/9781315139470
[3]   TOWARDS A QUANTITATIVE GRADING OF BLADDER-TUMORS [J].
DEMEESTER, U ;
YOUNG, IT ;
LINDEMAN, J ;
VANDERLINDEN, HC .
CYTOMETRY, 1991, 12 (07) :602-613
[4]  
FOLEY JD, 1990, COMPUTER GRAPHICS PR, P629
[5]   COMPARISON OF DIGITAL FOCUS CRITERIA FOR A TV MICROSCOPE SYSTEM [J].
HARMS, H ;
AUS, HM .
CYTOMETRY, 1984, 5 (03) :236-243
[6]  
HARMS H, 1986, PATTERN RECOGN, P519
[7]  
JUNGNICKEL D, 1987, NETZWERKE ALGORITHME
[8]   PATTERN-RECOGNITION IN HISTOPATHOLOGY BY ORDERS OF TEXTURES [J].
KAYSER, K ;
HOFFGEN, H .
MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 1984, 9 (01) :55-59
[9]  
KAYSER K, 1982, METHOD INFORM MED, V21, P15
[10]  
KAYSER K, 1990, ANAL CELL PATHOL, V2, P167