STETHOSCOPES - A POTENTIAL VECTOR OF INFECTION

被引：75

作者：

JONES, JS

HOERLE, D

RIEKSE, R

机构：

来源：

ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE | 1995年 / 26卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1016/S0196-0644(95)70075-7

中图分类号：

R4 [临床医学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100602 ;

摘要：

Study objectives: To survey emergency care providers about their stethoscope-cleaning measures and to determine the correlation between these measures and the extent of Staphylococcus carriage. Design: Prospective cross-sectional analysis. Setting: University-affiliated community hospital ED. Participants: One hundred fifty health care providers, comprising emergency medicine house staff and attending physicians (n=50), ED nurses (n=50), and prehospital personnel working in Kent County, Michigan(n=50). Interventions: Providers were asked how often they cleaned their stethoscopes and which cleaning agents were used. We then cultured each stethoscope by pressing the diaphragm on mannitol agar and incubating the culture aerobically for 48 hours. Staphylococcus aureus was identified by means of standard measures. We examined the effects of different cleaning agents on 24 stethoscopes. The numbers of colony-forming units (CFUs) before and after cleaning with alcohol, nonionic detergent, and antiseptic soap were noted. Results: Overall, 48% of health care providers (74 of 750) cleaned their stethoscopes daily or weekly, 37% monthly, and 7% yearly; and 7% had never cleaned their stethoscopes. No significant differences were found in the hygiene routines of the three groups of providers surveyed. Use of an alcohol swab was the preferred method of cleaning. One hundred thirty-three stethoscopes (89%) grew staphylococcal 25(19%) yielded S aureus. Mean staphylococcal bacterial counts (+/-SD) were 52+/-78 CFUs per stethoscope among physicians, 46+/-92 CFUs among emergency medical service personnel, and 13+/-21 CFUs from the nursing staff (ANOVA, P=.01). Cleaning the stethoscope diaphragm resulted in immediate reduction in the bacterial count: by 94% with alcohol swabs, 90% with nonionic detergent, and 75% with antiseptic soap. Conclusion: Our results confirm that stethoscopes used in emergency practice are often contaminated with staphylococci and are therefore a potential vector of infection. This contamination is greatly reduced by frequent cleaning with alcohol or nonionic detergent.

引用

页码：296 / 299

页数：4

共 10 条

[1] Haley, Culver, White, Et al., The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals, Am J Epidemiol, 121, pp. 182-205, (1985)
[2] Gerken, Cavanagh, Winner, Infection hazard from stethoscopes in hospital, Lancet, 1, pp. 1214-1215, (1972)
[3] Aycliffe, Lowbury, Geddes, Et al., Decontamination of the environment, equipment and the skin, Control of Hospital Infections: A Practical Handbook, pp. 78-114, (1992)
[4] Breathnach, Jenkins, Pedler, Stethoscopes as possible vectors of infection by staphylococci, BMJ, 305, pp. 1573-1574, (1992)
[5] Layton, Perez, Heald, Et al., An outbreak of mupirocin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on a dermatology ward associated with an environmental reservoir, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 14, pp. 369-375, (1993)
[6] Livornese, Dias, Samel, Et al., Hospital-acquired infection with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium transmitted by electronic thermometers, Ann Intern Med, 117, pp. 112-116, (1992)
[7] Patterson, Vecchio, Pantelick, Et al., Association of contaminated gloves with transmission of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus var. anitratus in an intensive care unit, Am J Med, 91, pp. 479-483, (1991)
[8] Wong, Nye, Hollis, Microbial flora on doctors' white coats, BMJ, 303, pp. 1602-1604, (1991)
[9] Meengs, Giles, Chisholm, Et al., Hand washing frequency in an emergency department, Ann Emerg Med, 23, pp. 1307-1312, (1994)
[10] Zimmerman, Neuman, Jurewicz, Infection Control For Prehospital Care Providers, pp. 13-14, (1993)

← 1 →