THE LOGISTIC MODELING OF INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT

被引:30
作者
COUGHLIN, SS
PICKLE, LW
GOODMAN, MT
WILKENS, LR
机构
[1] GEORGETOWN UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT MED,DIV STAT & COMP SCI,WASHINGTON,DC 20007
[2] NATL CTR HLTH STAT,OFF RES METHODOL,STAT TECHNOL STAFF,HYATTSVILLE,MD 20782
[3] UNIV HAWAII,CANC RES CTR,EPIDEMIOL PROGRAM,HONOLULU,HI 96822
关键词
BREAST CANCER; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELING; PERCENT AGREEMENT; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/0895-4356(92)90164-I
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
An approach to the logistic modeling of interobserver agreement is described that allows for the estimation of a commonly employed measure of agreement. The dependent variable is defined to be 1 if the two raters agree, and 0 otherwise. Covariates may be included in the regression equation in order to obtain adjusted or subgroup-specific estimates of percent agreement. As an empirical example, logistic models were fitted to data from a validation study of the agreement between interview information and physician records on the history of post-menopausal estrogen use, from a case-control study of breast cancer conducted on Oahu, Hawaii. Variables found to be related to agreement in previous univariate analyses were examined as covariates in the logistic model. The directly calculated estimates of percent agreement agreed well with the modeled estimates derived from the regression coefficients. Thus, the logistic model may provide a useful alternative to existing methods for the description of interobserver agreement.
引用
收藏
页码:1237 / 1241
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   A MODEL FOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN RATINGS ON AN ORDINAL SCALE [J].
AGRESTI, A .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (02) :539-548
[2]  
AKAIKE H, 1973, 2ND P INT S INF THEO
[3]   HIGH AGREEMENT BUT LOW KAPPA .2. RESOLVING THE PARADOXES [J].
CICCHETTI, DV ;
FEINSTEIN, AR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 43 (06) :551-558
[4]  
CORNFIELD J, 1962, FED PROC, V21, P58
[5]   THE LOGISTIC MODELING OF SENSITIVITY, SPECIFICITY, AND PREDICTIVE VALUE OF A DIAGNOSTIC-TEST - PRESENTATION [J].
COUGHLIN, SS ;
TROCK, B ;
CRIQUI, MH ;
PICKLE, LW ;
BROWNER, D ;
TEFFT, MC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (01) :1-7
[6]   MEASURING AGREEMENT FOR MULTINOMIAL DATA [J].
DAVIES, M ;
FLEISS, JL .
BIOMETRICS, 1982, 38 (04) :1047-1051
[7]   HIGH AGREEMENT BUT LOW KAPPA .1. THE PROBLEMS OF 2 PARADOXES [J].
FEINSTEIN, AR ;
CICCHETTI, DV .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 43 (06) :543-549
[8]   LARGE SAMPLE VARIANCE OF KAPPA IN THE CASE OF DIFFERENT SETS OF RATERS [J].
FLEISS, JL ;
NEE, JCM ;
LANDIS, JR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1979, 86 (05) :974-977
[9]  
FLEISS JL, 1986, J PSYCHIAT RES, V20, P195
[10]  
Fleiss JL., 1981, STAT METHODS RATES P, V2