IMPORTANCE OF PRECISE POSITIONING FOR PROTON-BEAM THERAPY IN THE BASE OF SKULL AND CERVICAL-SPINE

被引:16
作者
TATSUZAKI, H
URIE, MM
机构
[1] HARVARD UNIV,MASSACHUSETTS GEN HOSP,DEPT RADIAT MED,BOSTON,MA 02114
[2] HARVARD UNIV,SCH MED,BOSTON,MA 02115
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 1991年 / 21卷 / 03期
关键词
PROTON THERAPY; COMPARATIVE TREATMENT PLANNING; PRECISE POSITIONING; PATIENT IMMOBILIZATION; NORMAL TISSUE COMPLICATION PROBABILITY MODELS; TUMOR CONTROL PROBABILITY MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/0360-3016(91)90696-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Using proton beam therapy, high doses have been delivered to chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the base of skull and cervical spine. Dose inhomogeneity to the tumors has been accepted in order to maintain normal tissue tolerances, and detailed attention to patient immobilization and to precise positioning has minimized the margins necessary to ensure these dose constraints. This study examined the contribution of precise positioning to the better dose localization achieved in these treatments. Three patients whose tumors represented different anatomic geometries were studied. Treatment plans were developed which treated as much of the tumor as possible to 74 Cobalt-Gray-Equivalent (CGE) while maintaining the central brain stem and central spinal cord at less-than-or-equal-to 48 CGE, the surface of the brain stem, surface of the spinal cord, and optic structures at less-than-or-equal-to 60 CGE, and the temporal lobes at less-than-or-equal-to 5% likelihood of complication using a biophysical model of normal tissue complication probability. Two positioning accuracies were assumed: 3 mm and 10 mm. Both proton beam plans and 10 MV X ray beam plans were developed with these assumptions and dose constraints. In all cases with the same positioning uncertainties, the proton beam plans delivered more dose to a larger percentage of the tumor volume and the estimated tumor control probability was higher than with the X ray plans. However, without precise positioning both the proton plans and the X ray plans deteriorated, with a 12% to 25% decrease in estimated tumor control probability. In all but one case, the difference between protons with good positioning and poor positioning was greater than the difference between protons and X rays, both with good positioning. Hence in treating these tumors, which are in close proximity to critical normal tissues, attention to immobilization and precise positioning is essential. With good positioning, proton beam therapy permits higher doses to significantly more of the tumor in these sites than do X rays.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 765
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   FRACTIONATED PROTON RADIATION-THERAPY OF CHORDOMA AND LOW-GRADE CHONDROSARCOMA OF THE BASE OF THE SKULL [J].
AUSTINSEYMOUR, M ;
MUNZENRIDER, J ;
GOITEIN, M ;
VERHEY, L ;
URIE, M ;
GENTRY, R ;
BIRNBAUM, S ;
RUOTOLO, D ;
MCMANUS, P ;
SKATES, S ;
OJEMANN, RG ;
ROSENBERG, A ;
SCHILLER, A ;
KOEHLER, A ;
SUIT, HD .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1989, 70 (01) :13-17
[2]   PROGRESS IN LOW-LET HEAVY PARTICLE THERAPY - INTRACRANIAL AND PARACRANIAL TUMORS AND UVEAL MELANOMAS [J].
AUSTINSEYMOUR, M ;
MUNZENRIDER, JE ;
GOITEIN, M ;
GENTRY, R ;
GRAGOUDAS, E ;
KOEHLER, AM ;
MCNULTY, P ;
OSBORNE, E ;
RYUGO, DK ;
SEDDON, J ;
URIE, M ;
VERHEY, L ;
SUIT, HD .
RADIATION RESEARCH, 1985, 104 (02) :S219-S226
[3]   DOSIMETRIC PRECISION REQUIREMENTS IN RADIATION-THERAPY [J].
BRAHME, A .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA ONCOLOGY, 1984, 23 (05) :379-391
[4]   CHARGED-PARTICLE RADIOTHERAPY FOR LESIONS ENCIRCLING THE BRAIN-STEM OR SPINAL-CORD [J].
CASTRO, JR ;
COLLIER, JM ;
PETTI, PL ;
NOWAKOWSKI, V ;
CHEN, GTY ;
LYMAN, JT ;
LINSTADT, D ;
GAUGER, G ;
GUTIN, P ;
DECKER, M ;
PHILLIPS, TL ;
BAKEN, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1989, 17 (03) :477-484
[5]   MULTIDIMENSIONAL TREATMENT PLANNING .2. BEAM EYE-VIEW, BACK PROJECTION, AND PROJECTION THROUGH CT SECTIONS [J].
GOITEIN, M ;
ABRAMS, M ;
ROWELL, D ;
POLLARI, H ;
WILES, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1983, 9 (06) :789-797
[6]   COMPENSATION FOR INHOMOGENEITIES IN CHARGED-PARTICLE RADIOTHERAPY USING COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY [J].
GOITEIN, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1978, 4 (5-6) :499-508
[7]   CALCULATION OF THE UNCERTAINTY IN THE DOSE DELIVERED DURING RADIATION-THERAPY [J].
GOITEIN, M .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1985, 12 (05) :608-612
[8]   MULTIDIMENSIONAL TREATMENT PLANNING .1. DELINEATION OF ANATOMY [J].
GOITEIN, M ;
ABRAMS, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1983, 9 (06) :777-787
[9]  
GOITEIN M, 1987, NCI REPORT
[10]   CALCULATION OF COMPLICATION PROBABILITY FACTORS FOR NON-UNIFORM NORMAL TISSUE IRRADIATION - THE EFFECTIVE VOLUME METHOD [J].
KUTCHER, GJ ;
BURMAN, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1989, 16 (06) :1623-1630