CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE OF FIBRILLATORY WAVE AMPLITUDE - A CLUE TO LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE FUNCTION IN NONRHEUMATIC ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION

Seventy-eight patients with chronic nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation were studied by transesophageal echocardiography with regard to the left atrial appendage function and its relation to the coarseness of atrial fibrillation on electrocardiogram. These 78 patients (52 men and 26 women; mean age, 66+/-10 years; range, 40 to 94 years) were classified into two groups according to the presence of coarse (group 1, n=46; those with the greatest amplitude of fibrillatory wave in lead V-1 greater than or equal to 1 mm) or fine (group 2, n=32; those without the coarse fibrillatory wave in lead V-1) atrial fibrillation on a standard le-lead electrocardiogram within 1 month of echocardiographic studies, There were no significant differences in age, sex, mean duration of atrial fibrillation, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, left ventricular end-systolic dimension, left ventricular ejection fraction, and left atrial dimension between the two groups, In group 1, however, the left atrial appendage ejection fraction (24.4+/-14.2% vs 32.6+/-14.8%; p<0.05) and the peak emptying velocity (21.7+/-12.6 cm/s vs 30.4+/-14.3 cm/s; p<0.01) were lower than those in group 2, There were higher incidences of left atrial appendage spontaneous echo contrast (26/46 vs 7/32; p<0.005) and thrombus (8/46 vs 0/32; p<0.05) in group 1 patients, The coarse atrial fibrillation revealed a sensitivity of 80.0%, a specificity of 58.1%, a positive predictive value of 60.9%, and a negative predictive value of 78.1% for the presence of left atrial appendage spontaneous echo contrast and/or thrombus formation, In conclusion, in patients with coarse nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation, the left atrial appendage function is usually poor and the incidence of spontaneous echo contrast and thrombus formation appears to be higher in these patients.