COMFORT AND ENERGY-CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS IN BUILDINGS WITH RADIANT PANELS

被引：21

作者：

CHEN, QY

机构：

[1] Energy Systems Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, ETH-Zentrum

来源：

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS | 1990年 / 14卷 / 04期

关键词：

air distribution; comfort; computation; energy conservation; heating system; radiant panel; radiator; warm air;

D O I：

10.1016/0378-7788(90)90091-V

中图分类号：

TU [建筑科学];

学科分类号：

0813 ;

摘要：

A new methodology has been introduced for an overall and quantitative evaluation of comfort and energy consumption of an office room with a ceiling radiant heating system, radiator heating system, or a warm air heating system. The airflow program, PHOENICS-84, is used to study the three-dimensional distributions of indoor air velocity, air temperature, turbulent energy, and contaminant concentration in the room. With these results a draught risk distribution in the room can be numerically investigated. It has been found that the radiator heating system offers the best comfortable environment and the radiant heating system is better than the warm air heating system. The results also show that the radiant temperature asymmetry and the temperature difference between the enclosure surfaces and the room air are in the permissible comfort range in all the heating systems. The energy consumption of the room with the three different heating systems is determined by using the air-conditioning load program ACCURACY. It may be concluded that the radiant heating system uses 17% more energy than the other two systems. The main reason is that the ceiling heat capacity is very large and a great amount of heat is stored during office hours. The heating loads of the radiator heating system and the warm air heating system are nearly the same regardless of the energy used for the ventilators. © 1990.

引用

页码：287 / 297

页数：11

共 19 条

[1]

Tanabe, Et al., Differences in comfort and energy consumptions in spaces heated by radiant panel, warm air system, and floor panel, Proc. Second World Congress on Heating Ventilating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning, CLIMA 2000, 3, pp. 182-187, (1989)

[2]

Halliday, Croome, Thermal comfort in factories with overhead radiant heating, Proc. Second World Congress on Heating Ventilating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning, CLIMA 2000, 3, pp. 55-60, (1989)

[3]

Heimeriks, Radiant heating in churches, Proc. Second World Congress on Heating Ventilating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning, CLIMA 2000, 2, pp. 110-115, (1989)

[4]

Fanger, Thermal Comfort, (1982)

[5]

Fanger, Melikov, Hanzawa, Ring, Turbulence and draft, ASHRAE J., 31, 7, pp. 18-23, (1989)

[6]

Fanger, The human equation: health and comfort, Proc. Indoor Air Quality 89, pp. 1-9, (1989)

[7]

Fanger, Radiation and discomfort, ASHRAE J., 28, 4, pp. 33-34, (1986)

[8]

Zmeureanu, Fazio, Haghighat, Thermal performance of radiant heating panels, ASHRAE Trans., 94, pp. 13-27, (1988)

[9]

Weida, Life-cycle cost analysis of hydronic radiant panel, ASHRAE Trans., 92, pp. 603-615, (1986)

[10]

Christensen, Effects of radiant heat exchange and mean radiant temperature on predicted heating energy savings, ASHRAE Trans., 93, pp. 171-181, (1987)

← 1 2 →