BILE-DUCT DISRUPTION AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

被引:14
作者
WALKER, AT
BROOKS, DC
TUMEH, SS
BRAVER, JM
机构
[1] Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
[2] Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0887-2171(05)80054-X
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The reported prevalence of biliary tract disruption following laparoscopic cholecystectomy has ranged from 0% to 7% in early reports.1-3 We have reviewed the first 823 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed at our institution and found 13 symptomatic biliary complications necessitating further therapy (prevalence 1.6%). This finding represents a decrease from the 2.7% prevalence found in our earlier series. The incidence of biliary complications will likely continue to vary depending on patient selection, operator experience, and new developments in laparoscopic technique. Bile duct injury and bile leaks are often difficult to diagnose but must be strongly considered in postoperative patients with abdominal pain, fever, jaundice or continued bilious drainage from a surgical drain. Whereas computed tomography (CT) and sonography are sensitive in detecting perihepatic or free peritoneal fluid collections, they are nonspecific and definitive diagnosis of biliary tract injury requires hepatobiliary scintigraphy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC), or percutaneous aspiration. Disruption of the biliary tree has commonly been treated with reoperation or percutaneous drainage. More recently, endoscopic management has shown encouraging results for bile leaks and strictures in small series. © 1993 W.B. Saunders Company. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 355
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Walker, Shapiro, Brooks, Et al., Bile duct disruption and biloma after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Imaging evaluation, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 158, pp. 785-789, (1992)
[2]  
Peters, Ellison, Innes, Et al., Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Ann Surg, 213, pp. 3-12, (1991)
[3]  
Strasberg, Sanabria, Clavien, Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Can J Surg, 35, pp. 275-280, (1992)
[4]  
Andren-Sandberg, Johansson, Bengmark, Accidental lesions of the common bile duct at cholecystectomy, Ann Surg, 201, pp. 452-455, (1985)
[5]  
Moossa, Easter, Van Sonnenberg, Laparoscopic injuries to the bile duct: A cause for concern, Ann Surg, 215, pp. 203-208, (1992)
[6]  
Laing, Jeffrey, Wing, Et al., Biliary dilatation: Defining the level and cause by real-time US, Radiology, 160, pp. 39-42, (1986)
[7]  
Kang, Middleton, Balfe, Et al., Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Evaluation with sonography, Radiology, 181, pp. 439-442, (1991)
[8]  
Smith, Kolyn, Pymar, Ultrasonographic and radiologic evaluation of patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Can J Surg, 35, pp. 55-58, (1992)
[9]  
Baron, Common bile duct stones: Reassessment of criteria for CT diagnosis, Radiology, 162, pp. 419-424, (1987)
[10]  
Davidoff, Pappas, Murray, Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Ann Surg, 215, pp. 196-202, (1992)