INFLUENCE OF WEIGHT AND FREQUENCY ON THIGH AND LOWER-TRUNK MOTION DURING REPETITIVE LIFTING EMPLOYING STOOP AND SQUAT TECHNIQUES

被引：33

作者：

HAGEN, KB ^{[1
]}

SORHAGEN, O ^{[1
]}

HARMSRINGDAHL, K ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] KAROLINSKA INST,DEPT REHABIL PHYS MED,STOCKHOLM,SWEDEN

来源：

CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS | 1995年 / 10卷 / 03期

关键词：

REPETITIVE LIFTING; MOTION RANGE; MOTION ANALYSIS; WEIGHT OF LIFTING; FREQUENCY OF LIFTING; PATTERN OF MOVEMENT;

D O I：

10.1016/0268-0033(95)93701-T

中图分类号：

R318 [生物医学工程];

学科分类号：

0831 ;

摘要：

Changes in kinematics as a function of lifting weight and frequency was investigated in sagittal symmetric repetitive lifting. For every lift cycle (lowering and lifting) the motion range between the upright position (0 degrees) and the maximum angular displacement of the thigh and lower-trunk body segments was recorded. Ten subjects performed five repetitive lifting bouts with different weight/frequency combinations, using both stoop and squat lifting techniques. In total, 6384 lifts were analysed. The lifting weight or frequency did not influence the motion ranges in stoop lifting. In squat lifting the weight lifted did not appear to have any influence on the motion ranges, while the thigh motion range was significantly smaller at lifting frequency of 20 lifts min(-1) than at a frequency of 10. A significant gradual decrease in the thigh motion range and corresponding increase in the lower-trunk motion range were seen for a majority of the subjects during squat lifting at frequency 20. These changes suggest that quadriceps muscle strength is the limiting factor in repetitive squat lifting. Also the variation in motion ranges was greater in squat lifting than in stoop lifting.

引用

页码：122 / 127

页数：6

共 23 条

[1]

Andersson, Epidemiological aspects on low-back pain in industry, Spine, 6, pp. 53-60, (1981)

[2]

Bigos, Spengler, Martin, Et al., Back injuriesin industry: a retrospective study II. Injury factors, Spine, 11, pp. 246-251, (1986)

[3]

Ekholm, Arborelius, Nemeth, The load on the lumbo-sacral joint and trunk muscle activity during lifting, Ergonomics, 25, pp. 145-161, (1982)

[4]

Leskinen, Stalhammar, Kuorinka, A dynamic analysis of spinal compression with different lifting techniques, Ergonomics, 26, pp. 595-604, (1983)

[5]

Leskinen, Comparision of static and dynamic biomechanical models, Ergonomics, 28, pp. 285-291, (1985)

[6]

Bush-Joseph, Schipplein, Andersson, Andriacchi, Influence of dynamic factors on the lumbar spine moment in lifting, Ergonomics, 31, pp. 211-216, (1988)

[7]

Lindbeck, Arborelius, Inertial effects from single body segments in dynamic analysis of lifting, Ergonomics, 34, pp. 421-433, (1991)

[8]

Garg, Herrin, Stoop or squat a biomechanical and metabolic evaluation, A I I E Transactions, 11, pp. 293-302, (1979)

[9]

Garg, Saxena, Effects of lifting frequency and technique on physical fatigue with special reference to psychophysical methodology and metabolic rate, Am Ind Hyg Assoc J, 40, pp. 894-903, (1979)

[10]

Welbergen, Kemper, Knibbe, Et al., Efficiency and effectiveness of stoop and squat lifting at different frequencies, Ergonomics, 34, pp. 613-624, (1991)

← 1 2 3 →