QUANTIFICATION OF OCHRATOXIN-A IN SWINE KIDNEYS BY ENZYME-LINKED-IMMUNOSORBENT-ASSAY USING A SIMPLIFIED SAMPLE PREPARATION PROCEDURE

被引:18
作者
CLARKE, JR [1 ]
MARQUARDT, RR [1 ]
FROHLICH, AA [1 ]
PITURA, RJ [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MANITOBA,FAC AGR & FOOD SCI,DEPT ANIM SCI,WINNIPEG R3T 2N2,MB,CANADA
关键词
OCHRATOXIN A; SWINE KIDNEYS; ELISA;
D O I
10.4315/0362-028X-57.11.991
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
An improved procedure for sample preparation and quantitation of ochratoxin A (OA) in swine kidneys was developed. Kidney samples were homogenized in acidified ethyl acetate, centrifuged, sub-sampled dried, reconstituted with methanol and directly assayed using an indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The rabbit antisera used in the development of this assay was found to have a high degree of cross-reaction with ochratoxins A and C but not with ochratoxins B, alpha, 4-OH-OA and two structurally similar molecules L-phenylalanine and citrinin with the values being 100, 80, 3.33, 10, 1.4, 0 and 0.04%, respectively. Extraction recoveries as determined by high performance liquid chromatography in kidneys spiked with 0.97 to 15.62 ppb OA were determined. The recovery values ranged from 91 to 110% with acceptable inter-assay coefficients of variation (CV) being obtained at the 3.9 ppb spiking concentration or higher. The lowest reproducible OA detection limit for the ELISA in the spiked swine kidney samples was 7.81 ppb with inter-assay CV of 8.85%. The ELISA analysis of the spiked samples correlated highly with conventional high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis but was dependent on the conditions of the assay. Standards prepared in methanol or extract prepared from a kidney had correlation coefficients (r) of 0.91 +/- 0.09 and 0.94 +/- 0.07, respectively. The assay is sensitive, specific, simple and sufficiently accurate for routine analysis of swine kidneys.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 995
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   BALKAN NEPHROPATHY [J].
AUSTWICK, PKC .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE-LONDON, 1975, 68 (04) :219-221
[2]  
BARNES JM, 1977, LANCET, V2, P671
[3]   CRYSTAL-STRUCTURES AND CONFORMATIONAL-ANALYSIS OF OCHRATOXIN-A AND OCHRATOXIN-B - PROBING THE CHEMICAL-STRUCTURE CAUSING TOXICITY [J].
BREDENKAMP, MW ;
DILLEN, JLM ;
VANROOYEN, PH ;
STEYN, PS .
JOURNAL OF THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY-PERKIN TRANSACTIONS 2, 1989, (11) :1835-1839
[4]   A MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY TO OCHRATOXIN-A [J].
CANDLISH, AAG ;
STIMSON, WH ;
SMITH, JE .
LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 1986, 3 (01) :9-11
[5]  
CANDLISH AAG, 1991, MYCOTOXINS ANIMAL FO, P224
[6]  
CHU FS, 1990, VET HUM TOXICOL, V32, P42
[7]   DEVELOPMENT OF A QUANTITATIVE AND SENSITIVE ENZYME-LINKED-IMMUNOSORBENT-ASSAY FOR OCHRATOXIN-A USING ANTIBODIES FROM THE YOLK OF THE LAYING HEN [J].
CLARKE, JR ;
MARQUARDT, RR ;
OOSTERVELD, A ;
FROHLICH, AA ;
MADRID, FJ ;
DAWOOD, M .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1993, 41 (10) :1784-1789
[8]   COMPARATIVE RATES OF HYDROLYSIS OF OCHRATOXINS A AND B IN-VITRO [J].
DOSTER, RC ;
SINNHUBER, RO .
FOOD AND COSMETICS TOXICOLOGY, 1972, 10 (03) :389-+
[9]  
FROHLICH AA, 1988, J ASSOC OFF ANA CHEM, V71, P949
[10]  
FUCHS R, 1972, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V48, P41