Tacit Knowledge Meets Analytic Kantianism

被引:3
作者
Turner, Stephen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Philosophy, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
关键词
tacit knowledge; normativism; Pittsburgh School; John McDowell; Hubert Dreyfus; Michael Polanyi;
D O I
10.5840/traddisc2014/20154116
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Neil Gascoigne and Tim Thornton's Tacit Knowledge is an attempt to find a place for tacit knowledge as "knowledge" within the limits of analytic epistemology. They do so by reference to Jason Stanley and Timothy Williamson's analysis of the term "way" and by the McDowell-like claim that reference to the tacitly rooted "way" of doing something exhausts the knowledge aspect of tacit knowledge, which preserves the notion of tacit knowledge, while excluding most of Michael Polanyi's examples, and rendering Hubert Dreyfus's and John Searle's accounts irrelevant. This is more a redefinition of terms than an account of tacit knowledge.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 47
页数:15
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, TALES MIGHTY DEAD HI
[2]  
[Anonymous], INTERESSE DENKENS HE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, WHAT COMPUTERS STILL
[4]  
Brandom Robert, 1994, MAKING IT EXPLICIT R
[5]  
Cussins A., 2003, ESSAYS NONCONCEPTUAL, P133
[6]  
Dreifus Claudia, 2001, NY TIMES
[7]  
Dreyfus H., 1986, MIND MACHINE
[8]  
Dreyfus H., 1985, PHILOS TECHNOLOGY 11, P111
[9]  
Dreyfus H. L., 2005, P ADDRESSES AM PHILO, V79, P47
[10]   Response to McDowell [J].
Dreyfus, Hubert L. .
INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2007, 50 (04) :371-377