APPLICATION OF NONMEM TO ROUTINE BIOAVAILABILITY DATA

被引:21
作者
GRAVES, DA
CHANG, I
机构
[1] Department of Clinical Research and Development, Fisons Pharmaceuticals
来源
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS | 1990年 / 18卷 / 02期
关键词
extended release; nonlinear mixed effects model (NONMEM); normal volunteers; pharmacokinetics;
D O I
10.1007/BF01063557
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Although NONMEM has been proposed as a modeling tool for sparse data sets, little work has described its application to pharmacokinetic data which is also amenable to typical evaluations. An analysis was performed with NONMEM using plasma concentration data obtained during the development of liquid and capsule extended-release (ER) pseudoephedrine products. A total of four studies (single dose and steady-state studies for both the liquid and capsule formulations) were evaluated, each with an immediate-release (IR) control, and consisting of 18 to 20 subjects. NONMEM analyses provided additional information which could not be obtained through traditional means. Specifically, NONMEM provided not only estimates of residual error from single dose and steady-state studies but also a stochastic measure of bioinequivalence and dose-dumping. It permitted hypothesis testing in the same process as pharmacokinetic parameter estimation, such as contrasting absorption rates from capsule and suspension ER products. A less biased estimate of absorption rate was obtainable for E R formulations by utilizing IR runs. Finally, these NONMEM runs confirmed that, even when data are plentiful and amenable to two-stage analyses, NONMEM provides estimates that may in fact be more meaningful and less susceptible to assay or residual variability. Fundamental differences between population and two-stage approaches are discussed. © 1990 Plenum Publishing Corporation.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 160
页数:16
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Beal S, 1980, NONMEM USERS GUIDE 1
[2]  
BEAL SL, 1985, NONMEM USERS GUIDE 6
[3]   POPULATION PHARMACOKINETICS OF PROCAINAMIDE FROM ROUTINE CLINICAL-DATA [J].
GRASELA, TH ;
SHEINER, LB .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1984, 9 (06) :545-554
[4]  
GRAVES DA, 1988, CURR THER RES CLIN E, V43, P630
[5]  
GRAVES DA, 1985, CLIN PHARMACY, V4, P199
[6]   THE INFLUENCE OF ASSAY VARIABILITY ON PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETER-ESTIMATION [J].
GRAVES, DA ;
LOCKE, CS ;
MUIR, KT ;
MILLER, RP .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 1989, 17 (05) :571-592
[7]   A COMPARISON OF THE 2 ONE-SIDED TESTS PROCEDURE AND THE POWER APPROACH FOR ASSESSING THE EQUIVALENCE OF AVERAGE BIOAVAILABILITY [J].
SCHUIRMANN, DJ .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 1987, 15 (06) :657-680
[8]   EVALUATION OF METHODS FOR ESTIMATING POPULATION PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS .3. MONOEXPONENTIAL MODEL - ROUTINE CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETIC DATA [J].
SHEINER, LB ;
BEAL, SL .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 1983, 11 (03) :303-319
[9]   THE POPULATION APPROACH TO PHARMACOKINETIC DATA-ANALYSIS - RATIONALE AND STANDARD DATA-ANALYSIS METHODS [J].
SHEINER, LB .
DRUG METABOLISM REVIEWS, 1984, 15 (1-2) :153-171
[10]   EVALUATION OF METHODS FOR ESTIMATING POPULATION PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS .2. BIEXPONENTIAL MODEL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOKINETIC DATA [J].
SHEINER, LB ;
BEAL, SL .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 1981, 9 (05) :635-651