Physician Perspectives on a Pilot Prescription Monitoring Program

被引:27
作者
Barrett, Kirsten [1 ]
Watson, Ashby [2 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, VCU Survey & Evaluat Res Lab, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Med Ctr, Massey Canc Ctr, Richmond, VA USA
关键词
Prescription Monitoring Program; state pain policy; physician prescribing behavior; pain; controlled substances;
D O I
10.1300/J354v19n03_03
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 [麻醉学];
摘要
In 2003, during implementation of a pilot electronic prescription monitoring program in southwest Virginia, a survey was mailed to 672 physicians to learn about their knowledge of and attitudes toward the program and its impact on their opioid prescribing behaviors. A total of 275 surveys were returned yielding a response rate of 41%. Less than one-half had previously heard about the prescription monitoring program. Nearly 60% believed their prescribing behaviors were being monitored more closely as a result of the program; of these, 23% reported that this had a negative impact on their ability to help patients manage their pain. Sixty-eight percent reported that the prescription monitoring program was useful for monitoring patients' prescription histories and decreasing "doctor shopping"; however, only 11% had requested information from the prescription monitoring program database, primarily due to access barriers. Recommendations include education to increase physician awareness of and utilization of the program and to address their concerns about scrutiny of practice and collection of relevant data that examines the impact of the program on diversion, abuse, and quality of patient care for persons in pain. [Article copies available for a fee from The Haworth Document Delivery Service: 1-800-HAWORTH. E-mail address: <docdelivery@ haworthpress. com> Website: <http://www.HaworthPress. com> (C) 2005 by The Haworth Press, Inc. All rights reserved.]
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 13
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]
Advisory Committee Meeting Department of Health Professions, 2003, PRESCR MON PROGR WOR
[2]
American Cancer Society, 2001, POS STAT REG BARR QU
[3]
PHYSICIAN PERCEPTION OF A TRIPLICATE PRESCRIPTION LAW [J].
BERINA, LF ;
GUERNSEY, BG ;
HOKANSON, JA ;
DOUTRE, WH ;
FULLER, LE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 1985, 42 (04) :857-859
[4]
Bureau of Justice Assistance, HAR ROG PRESCR MON P
[5]
Department of Health Professions Advisory Committee Meeting, 2003, PRESCR MON PROGR
[6]
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Care at the End of Life, 1997, APPROACHING DEATH IM
[7]
Pain management and prescription monitoring [J].
Joranson, DE ;
Carrow, GM ;
Ryan, KM ;
Schaefer, L ;
Gilson, AM ;
Good, P ;
Eadie, J ;
Peine, S ;
Dahl, JL .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2002, 23 (03) :231-238
[8]
Kaufman M., 2005, WASHINGTON POST
[9]
National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1993, IMP PRESCR DRUG DIV, V131
[10]
EFFECT OF A TRIPLICATE PRESCRIPTION LAW ON PRESCRIBING OF SCHEDULE-II DRUGS [J].
SIGLER, KA ;
GUERNSEY, BG ;
INGRIM, NB ;
BUESING, AS ;
HOKANSON, JA ;
GALVAN, E ;
DOUTRE, WH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 1984, 41 (01) :108-111