BINOCULAR RIVALRY AND RECIPROCAL INHIBITION

被引:78
作者
FOX, R
RASCHE, F
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, 37203, Tennessee
来源
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS | 1969年 / 5卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03210542
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Any explanation of binocular rivalry based on a reciprocal inhibition mechanism would require that unilateral increases in the stimulus strength of the rivalry target in one eye produce increases in the mean nonsuppression duration of that eye and concommitant decreases in the mean nonsuppression duration of the contralateral eye. To test that hypothesis, the stimulus strength (in this case, contrast) of one rivalry target was varied (0.1, 1, 10, and 100 ft-L) while the strength of the target in the other eye remained constant. The data, obtained from six experienced Ss, indicate that variations in stimulus strength do not alter the mean nonsuppression duration of the recipient eye. This outcome offers a fundamental difficulty for the reciprocal inhibition concept. A model that assumes partially independent suppression and dominance mechanisms is suggested as a more adequate alternative. © 1969 Psychonomic Journals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / &
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
BREESE BB, 1899, PSYCHOL MONOGR, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.1037/H0092990
[2]   POSSIBLE MONOCULAR PREDICTORS OF BINOCULAR RIVALRY OF CONTOURS [J].
CROVITZ, HF ;
LOCKHEAD, GR .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1967, 2 (02) :83-85
[3]  
HUBEL DH, 1962, J PHYSL, V160, P107
[4]  
Levelt W. J. M., 1965, BINOCULAR RIVALRY
[5]  
RATLIFF F, 1962, PSYCHOLOGY STUDY SCI, V4
[6]  
Ratliff F., 1965, MACH BANDS QUANTITAT
[7]  
Sherrington C., 1906, INTEGRATIVE ACTION N, DOI 10.1037/13798-009
[8]  
WOODWORTH RS, 1938, EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOL