A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF TURKISH AND BELGIAN YOUTH

被引:64
作者
PHALET, K [1 ]
CLAEYS, W [1 ]
机构
[1] CATHOLIC UNIV LEUVEN,DEPT PSYCHOL,B-3000 LOUVAIN,BELGIUM
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0022022193243004
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In a comparative study of Belgian and Turkish youth and Turkish migrant youth in Belgium, the psychological relevance of individualistic-collectivistic value orientations for personal motivation was studied. A new Motives Questionnaire with cross-culturally equivalent scales for general motivational dimensions is presented. A multiple-strategy approach is proposed to establish equivalence, combining factor analysis and individual difference scaling (INDSCAL) with a measure of external validity in each group. Our findings support partial equivalence and allow a refinement of the individualism-collectivism opposition, revealing motivational conflicts of individualistic Self-Realization and Autonomy poles with respectively collectivist Social Contact and Group Loyalty poles. Effects of social and cultural change on motivation are discussed. Preference for individualistic Self-Realization together with collectivist Group Loyalty in modem Turkish youth integrates individualistic-collectivist values into a group-oriented achievement motive.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 343
页数:25
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Ames C., 1984, RES MOTIVATION ED ST, V3, P177
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, MOTIVATION FACTOR TH
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1980, ACCULTURATION THEORY
[4]  
Bakan D., 1966, DUALITY HUMAN EXISTE
[5]  
BASARAN F, 1988, UNPUB TURKISH U STUD
[6]  
Berry J., 1980, HDB CROSS CULTURAL P, V5, P211, DOI DOI 10.1525/AA.1982.84.2.02A00060
[8]  
Brislin R.W., 1986, FIELD METHODS CROSS, DOI DOI 10.1177/017084068800900318
[9]  
CAMMAERT MF, 1985, MIGRANTEN THUISBLIJV
[10]  
Canter D.V., 1985, FACET THEORY APPROAC