RESIDUAL COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTIONING AT 6 MONTHS FOLLOWING CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT-SURGERY

被引:28
作者
BRUGGEMANS, EF
VANDIJK, JG
HUYSMANS, HA
机构
[1] Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital, Leiden, RC, 2300
[2] Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Leiden, RC, 2300
关键词
CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT SURGERY; COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTIONING; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1016/S1010-7940(05)80110-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Neuropsychological testing is a sensitive method for quantitative assessment of cognitive dysfunctioning following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), However, the methodological problems associated with this method, such as learning effects due to repeated testing and the effects of distress on test performance, have often been underestimated, In this study, these confounding effects were controlled for by including the spouses of patients, exposed to the same potential stress effects associated with the operation, as a nonsurgical control group, The experimental group consisted of 63 patients (40-75 years) undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, A battery of standardized neuropsychological tests was administered to both groups 2 weeks preoperatively and 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months postoperatively. Statistical testing of inter-group differences in preoperative to postoperative changes in test performance revealed the following results: (1) For immediate memory and learning, in general test scores showed the same time course for both groups, (2) For recent memory, patients' scores showed a significant deterioration at 1 month after CABG surgery compared with the scores of spouses, This effect had not completely disappeared at 6 months postoperatively. (3) For attention and psychomotor speed as well as verbal fluency, patients' scores had deteriorated significantly at 1 week after surgery, with incomplete recovery at 6 months, These negative cognitive effects were not related to the patients' ages or CPB parameters (duration of CPB, aortic cross-clamp time, mean flow and arterial pressure during CPB and aortic cross-clamping, and minimum nasopharyngeal temperature), No differences in self-ratings of mood over time were found between the patients and spouses, The results indicate that, when adequately controlling for the effects of learning and distress, some cognitive functions are still impaired at 6 months after CABG surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:636 / 643
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Benton A.L., Hamsher K., Multilingual aphasia examination, Manual-Revised, (1978)
[2]  
Cl B., Smith P.L., Arnold J.V., Jagoe J.R., Wootton R., Taylor K.M., Influence of oxygenator type on the prevalence and extent of microembolic retinal ischemia during cardiopulmonary bypass: Assessment by digital image analysis, J Thorac Car-Diovasc Surg, 99, pp. 61-69, (1990)
[3]  
Campbell D.T., Stanley J.C., Experimental and Quasiexperimental Designs for Research, pp. 7-12, (1963)
[4]  
Christensen L., Mendoza J.L., A method of assessing change in a single subject: An alteration of the RC Index, Behav Ther, 17, pp. 305-308, (1986)
[5]  
De Sonneville L., Schaap T., Elshout J.J., The Amsterdam Mood State Questionnaire, Manual, (1985)
[6]  
Fish K.J., Helms K.N., Sarnquist F.H., Van Steenms C., Lmet O.L., Hilberman M., Mitchell R.S., Jamieson S.W., Miller D.G., Tmklen-Berg J.S., A prospective, randomized study of the effects of prostacyclin on neuropsychologic dysfunction after coronary artery operation, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 93, pp. 609-615, (1987)
[7]  
Folstein M.F., Folstein S.E., Mc Hugh P.R., Mini-Mental State”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician, J Psychiatr Res, 12, pp. 189-198, (1975)
[8]  
Hageman W., Arrindell W.A., A further refinement of the Reliable Change (RC) Index by improving the pre-post difference score introducing RCID, Behav Res Ther, 31, pp. 693-700, (1993)
[9]  
Hammeke T.A., Hastings J.E., Neuropsychologic alterations after cardiac operation, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 96, pp. 326-331, (1988)
[10]  
Jacobson N.S., Follette W.C., Revenstorf D., Psychotherapy outcome research: Methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance, Behav Ther, 15, pp. 336-352, (1984)