CONTRAST DEPENDENCE OF MOTION-ONSET AND PATTERN-REVERSAL EVOKED-POTENTIALS

This study deals with the effect of stimulus contrast, between 1.3% and 96%, on the visual evoked potentials (VEPs) for onset of motion and for pattern reversal of checkerboard stimuli. The VEPs for pattern reversal and for the onset of motion both contain an initial positive peak (P-1; peak latency about 120 msec) followed by a later negative peak (N-2; peak latency 160-200 msec). However the P-1 peak dominates the pattern-reversal VEP when recorded from the midline occipital lead, where it is maximal, while the N-2 peak is larger in the motion-onset VEP, especially when recorded from unipolar lateral occipital leads, Whereas the amplitude of the P-1 peak in both the pattern-reversal VEP and the motion-onset VEP decreases with decreasing contrast (becoming undetectable at a contrast of about 2% for the motion-onset VEP), the amplitude of the N-2 peak in both types of VEP does not vary significantly with contrast, above a contrast of 1.3%, The increase in peak latency with decreasing contrast is also more pronounced for the positive than the negative peaks of both types of VEP. Taking into account the high contrast sensitivity of the magnocellular system (thought to be involved in the processing of motion) compared with the parvocellular system (probably more concerned with the processing of form), our findings suggest that for both motion-onset and pattern-reversal VEPs the negative peak is attributable to the motion-processing magnocellular pathway and the positive peak to the form-processing parvocellular system.