NEOGENE CARBONATE STRATIGRAPHY OF ONTONG-JAVA']JAVA PLATEAU (WESTERN EQUATORIAL PACIFIC) - 3 UNEXPECTED FINDINGS

被引:13
作者
BERGER, WH
STAX, R
机构
[1] Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, La Jolla, California
[2] Alfred-Wegener-Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, 27568
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-3121.1994.tb00896.x
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The Neogene carbonate stratigraphy of five sites drilled on Ontong Java Plateau during Leg 130 reveals a number of patterns which are unexpected, and which we refer to as loss paradox, equatorial insensitivity, and climate paradox. They denote the following unresolved questions. 1 The loss of carbonate at depth (as derived from differences in accumulation rates) is much greater than suggested by the change in carbonate percentages (calculated under the assumption that carbonate dissolution is the cause of loss). This indicates an important role for redeposition processes, such as winnowing (bottom currents), sifting (resuspension and catabatic flow) and episodic sloughing or solifluction (presumably stimulated by earthquakes). 2 Accumulation rates are not markedly increased at the time a site crosses the equator. There are several possible reasons. Equatorial upwelling may be unimportant in controlling sedimentation rates this far in the western Pacific, or its output may be spread over a considerable distance from the equator. Alternatively, increased supply below the equator is compensated for by increased removal (e.g. from resuspension by bioturbation, combined with catabatic flow). It is conceivable that errors in the time-scale could also produce the effect seen. 3 There is an overall tendency for agreement between the stratigraphic patterns of carbonate content and of accumulation rates, but neither pattern is readily explained by reference to changes in climate (represented by benthic delta(18)O) or in sea-level (as derived from sequence stratigraphy).
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 534
页数:15
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Andrews J.E., Packham G.H., Et al., Init. Repts Deep Sea drill Proj., 30, (1975)
[2]  
Arrhenius G., Pelgic sediments, The Sea, 3, pp. 655-727, (1963)
[3]  
Barnola J.M., Raynaud D., Korotkevitch Y.S., Lorius C., Vostok ice core provides 160,000‐year record atmosphere CO<sub>2</sub>, Nature, 329, pp. 408-414, (1987)
[4]  
Berger W.H., Cenozoic sedimentation in the eastern tropical Pacific, Bull. geol. Soc. Am., 84, pp. 1941-1954, (1973)
[5]  
Berger W.H., Sedimentation of deep‐sea carbonate: maps and models of variations and fluctuations, The Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 8, 4, pp. 286-302, (1978)
[6]  
Berger W.H., Johnson T.C., Deep‐sea carbonates: dissolution and mass wasting on Ontong Java Plateau, Science, 192, pp. 785-787, (1976)
[7]  
Berger W.H., Keir R.S., Glacial‐Holocene changes in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and the deep‐sea record, Geophys. Monogr., 29, pp. 337-351, (1984)
[8]  
Berger W.H., Killingley J.S., Box cores from the Equatorial Pacific: <sup>14</sup>C sedimentation rates and benthic mixing, Mar. Geol., 45, pp. 93-125, (1982)
[9]  
Berger W.H., Spitzy A., History of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>: constraints from the deep‐sea record, Paleoceanography, 3, 4, pp. 401-411, (1988)
[10]  
Berger W.H., Wefer G., Klimageschichte aus Tiefseesedimenten, Naturwissenschaften, 79, pp. 1-10, (1992)