PRECONDITIONS FOR SENSITIVITY IN MEASURING CHANGE - VISUAL ANALOG SCALES COMPARED TO RATING-SCALES IN A LIKERT FORMAT

被引:45
作者
PFENNINGS, L
COHEN, L
VANDERPLOEG, H
机构
[1] Department of Medical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
关键词
D O I
10.2466/pr0.1995.77.2.475
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In a study of preconditions of responsiveness, we examined the variances obtained by two different ways of responding to questionnaire items. Subjects were 168 first-year medical students. They all completed a questionnaire of nine items. The original Likert-like scoring was (partially) replaced by visual analogue scoring in three quarters of the questionnaires. For three items the analogue form had a significantly greater variance than the discrete form, but no discrete item had a significantly greater variance than its analogue counterpart. Assuming that a greater variance was indicative for a greater responsiveness, our findings provide some support for the preferred use of analogue scales over discrete response categories in the measurement of changes over time.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 480
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]   MEASUREMENT OF FEELINGS USING VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALES [J].
AITKEN, RCB .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE-LONDON, 1969, 62 (10) :989-+
[3]   RELIABILITY AND CONCURRENT VALIDITY OF 3 VISUAL-ANALOG MOOD SCALES [J].
CELLA, DF ;
PERRY, SW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1986, 59 (02) :827-833
[4]  
*CENTR BUR STAT, 1988, NETH HLTH INT SURV 1
[5]  
Guilford J. P., 1954, J EDUC PSYCHOL, Vsecond
[6]   MEASURING CHANGE OVER TIME - ASSESSING THE USEFULNESS OF EVALUATIVE INSTRUMENTS [J].
GUYATT, G ;
WALTER, S ;
NORMAN, G .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (02) :171-178
[7]   RESPONSIVENESS AND VALIDITY IN HEALTH-STATUS MEASUREMENT - A CLARIFICATION [J].
GUYATT, GH ;
DEYO, RA ;
CHARLSON, M ;
LEVINE, MN ;
MITCHELL, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1989, 42 (05) :403-408
[8]   GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF PAIN [J].
SCOTT, J ;
HUSKISSON, EC .
PAIN, 1976, 2 (02) :175-184
[9]  
Van Weel C., 1992, FUNCTIONAL STATUS AS