PATHOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL FINDINGS TO PREDICT TUMOR EXTENT OF NONPALPABLE (STAGE-T1C) PROSTATE-CANCER

被引:1474
作者
EPSTEIN, JI
WALSH, PC
CARMICHAEL, M
BRENDLER, CB
机构
[1] JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV HOSP,JAMES BUCHANAN BRADY UROL INST,BALTIMORE,MD 21205
[2] JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT PATHOL,BALTIMORE,MD 21205
[3] JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT UROL,BALTIMORE,MD 21205
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 1994年 / 271卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.271.5.368
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives.-We examined preoperative clinical and pathologic parameters in men with clinical stage T1c disease who underwent radical prostatectomy and correlated these findings with the pathologic extent of disease in the surgical specimen in an attempt to identify a subset of patients with potentially biologically insignificant tumor who might be followed up without immediate treatment. Design and Patients.-A case series of 157 consecutive men who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1c disease compared with 64 similarly treated clinical stage T1a cancers (incidental minimal cancers found on transurethral resection of prostate) and 439 clinical stage T2 (palpable) cancers. Main Outcome Measures.-Pathologic stage, grade, and margins; tumor volume; and tumor location. Results.-Sixteen percent of tumors were insignificant (<0.2 cm3 and confined to the prostate, with a Gleason score <7); 10% were minimal (0.2 to 0.5 cm3 and confined to the prostate, with a Gleason score <7); 37% were moderate (>0.5 cm3 or capsular penetration, with a Gleason score <7); and 37% were advanced (capsular penetration, with a Gleason score greater-than-or-equal-to 7 or positive margins, seminal vesicles, or lymph nodes). These findings are intermediate between those found in clinical stage T1a and stage T2 disease. The following parameters were not predictive of tumor extent: age, reason for evaluation, method of detection, and transrectal ultrasound. The best model predicting insignificant tumor was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density less than 0.1 ng/mL per gram and no adverse pathologic findings on needle biopsy, or PSA density of 0.1 to 0.15 ng/mL per gram, with a low- to intermediate-grade cancer smaller than 3 mm found in only one needle biopsy core specimen. The positive predictive value of the model was 95%, with a negative predictive value of 66%. We accurately predicted 73% of cases with insignificant tumor. Conclusions.-Eighty-four percent of nonpalpable prostate cancers diagnosed by screening techniques are significant tumors and warrant definitive therapy. However, 16% are insignificant. Serum PSA level, PSA density, and needle biopsy pathologic findings are accurate predictors of tumor extent. lt may be reasonable to follow up some patients whose tumors are most likely insignificant with serial PSA measurements and repeated biopsies.
引用
收藏
页码:368 / 374
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] NEEDLE-BIOPSY ASSOCIATED TUMOR TRACKING OF ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE
    BASTACKY, SS
    WALSH, PC
    EPSTEIN, JI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 145 (05) : 1003 - 1007
  • [2] PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN DENSITY - A MEANS OF DISTINGUISHING BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERTROPHY AND PROSTATE-CANCER
    BENSON, MC
    WHANG, IS
    PANTUCK, A
    RING, K
    KAPLAN, SA
    OLSSON, CA
    COONER, WH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 147 (03) : 815 - 816
  • [3] THE USE OF PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN DENSITY TO ENHANCE THE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF INTERMEDIATE LEVELS OF SERUM PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN
    BENSON, MC
    WHANG, IS
    OLSSON, CA
    MCMAHON, DJ
    COONER, WH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 147 (03) : 817 - 821
  • [4] LONGITUDINAL EVALUATION OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN LEVELS IN MEN WITH AND WITHOUT PROSTATE DISEASE
    CARTER, HB
    PEARSON, JD
    METTER, J
    BRANT, LJ
    CHAN, DW
    ANDRES, R
    FOZARD, JL
    WALSH, PC
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 267 (16): : 2215 - 2220
  • [5] EVALUATION OF TRANS-RECTAL ULTRASOUND IN THE EARLY DETECTION OF PROSTATE-CANCER
    CARTER, HB
    HAMPER, UM
    SHETH, S
    SANDERS, RC
    EPSTEIN, JI
    WALSH, PC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 142 (04) : 1008 - 1010
  • [6] MEASUREMENT OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN SERUM AS A SCREENING-TEST FOR PROSTATE-CANCER
    CATALONA, WJ
    SMITH, DS
    RATLIFF, TL
    DODDS, KM
    COPLEN, DE
    YUAN, JJJ
    PETROS, JA
    ANDRIOLE, GL
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 324 (17) : 1156 - 1161
  • [7] PROSTATE-CANCER DETECTION IN A CLINICAL UROLOGICAL PRACTICE BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION AND PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN
    COONER, WH
    MOSLEY, BR
    RUTHERFORD, CL
    BEARD, JH
    POND, HS
    TERRY, WJ
    IGEL, TC
    KIDD, DD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1990, 143 (06) : 1146 - 1154
  • [8] EPSTEIN JI, 1993, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V71, P3582, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19930601)71:11<3582::AID-CNCR2820711120>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-Y
  • [10] PROGNOSIS OF UNTREATED STAGE-A1 PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA - A STUDY OF 94 CASES WITH EXTENDED FOLLOW-UP
    EPSTEIN, JI
    PAULL, G
    EGGLESTON, JC
    WALSH, PC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1986, 136 (04) : 837 - 839