PARTIALLY SATURATED FLUID ATTENUATED INVERSION-RECOVERY (FLAIR) SEQUENCES IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS - COMPARISON WITH FULLY RELAXED FLAIR AND CONVENTIONAL SPIN-ECHO

被引:23
作者
BARATTI, C [1 ]
BARKHOF, F [1 ]
HOOGENRAAD, F [1 ]
VALK, J [1 ]
机构
[1] FREE UNIV AMSTERDAM HOSP,DEPT DIAGNOST RADIOL,1007 MB AMSTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
关键词
FLUID ATTENUATED INVERSION RECOVERY (FLAIR); MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS (MS); CEREBROSPINAL FLUID (CSF); NORMAL APPEARING WHITE MATTER (NAWM);
D O I
10.1016/0730-725X(95)00009-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences produce selective cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) suppression by employing a very long inversion time (TI). We used the FLAIR sequence to study patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) at 0.6 T. So far, a very long TR (and long acquisition time) has been used in a fully relaxed (FR-FLAIR) system. To speed up the FLAIR sequences, we used a shorter TR, and demonstrated that complete CSF suppression can be maintained with partial saturation (PS-FLAIR) by reducing TI at the same time. The introduction of partial saturation, however, reduced the contrast between lesions and normal appearing white matter (NAWM). Suboptimal CSF suppression therefore had to be accepted to maintain sufficient lesion to NAWM contrast. Using a TE of 60 ms, the PS-FLAIR and PR-FLAIR performed equally well in the detection of MS-lesions, although the former provided poorer CSF suppression. Both FLAIR sequences, however, provided poorer contrast between lesions and NAWM compared to conventional spin-echo sequences. Although the long acquisition time of the FLAIR sequence can be reduced by using partial saturation, complete CSF suppression and good lesion to NAWM contrast are incompatible at short TRs. Using a TE of 60 ms, conventional spin-echo sequences detect more lesions and provide better contrast between lesions and NAWM than FLAIR sequences in MS patients.
引用
收藏
页码:513 / 521
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Young, Hall, Pallis, Et al., Nuclear magnetic resonance of the brain in multiple sclerosis, Lancet, 2, pp. 1063-1066, (1981)
[2]  
Paty, Oger, Kastrukoff, Et al., Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A prospective study of comparison with clinical evaluation, evoked potential, oligoclonal banding and CT, Neurology, 28, pp. 180-185, (1988)
[3]  
lee, Hashimoto, Hooge, Et al., Magnetic resonance imaging of the head in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A 2-year follow-up with comparison with clinical evaluation, evoked potential, oligoconal banding and CT, Neurology, 41, pp. 657-660, (1992)
[4]  
Scotti, Scialfa, Biondi, Et al., Magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis, Neuroradiology, 28, pp. 319-323, (1986)
[5]  
Appel, Moens, Rinck, Et al., Abord de la sclerose en plaque par l'IRM, J. Neuroradiol., 14, pp. 154-159, (1988)
[6]  
Barnes, McDonald, Johnson, Et al., Quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance imaging characterisation of experimental cerebral edema, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 50, pp. 125-133, (1987)
[7]  
Teresi, Hovda, Seely, Et al., Magnetic resonance imaging of experimental demyelination, Am. J. Neuroradiol., 10, pp. 307-314, (1989)
[8]  
Barnes, McDonald, Landon, Johnson, The characterisation of experimental gliosis by quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, Brain, 111, pp. 82-94, (1988)
[9]  
Hajnal, Bryant, Kasuboski, Et al., Use of fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) pulse sequence in MRI of the brain, J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr., 16, pp. 841-844, (1992)
[10]  
Pennock, De Cohen, Hajnal, Et al., Imaging of the brain in multiple sclerosis using fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences, Book of abstracts: Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, (1992)