THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF CONTRACEPTION - A COMPARISON OF 15 METHODS

被引:166
作者
TRUSSELL, J
LEVEQUE, JA
KOENIG, JD
LONDON, R
BORDEN, S
HENNEBERRY, J
LAGUARDIA, KD
STEWART, F
WILSON, TG
WYSOCKI, S
STRAUSS, M
机构
[1] PRINCETON UNIV,DEPT ECON,PRINCETON,NJ 08544
[2] HLTH TECHNOL ASSOCIATES,WASHINGTON,DC
[3] KAISER PERMANENTE MED GRP MID ATLANTIC REG,DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL,BALTIMORE,MD
[4] WYATT CO,WELLESLEY,MA
[5] COLORADO DEPT HLTH,DENVER,CO
[6] CORNELL UNIV,COLL MED,DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL,NEW YORK,NY
[7] US DEPT HHS,OFF POPULAT AFFAIRS,BETHESDA,MD
[8] CALIF DEPT HLTH SERV,SACRAMENTO,CA
[9] NATL ASSOC NURSE PRACTITIONERS REPROD HLTH,WASHINGTON,DC
关键词
D O I
10.2105/AJPH.85.4.494
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives. The purpose of the study was to determine the clinical and economic impact of alternative contraceptive methods. Methods. Direct medical costs (method use, side effects, and unintended pregnancies) associated with 15 contraceptive methods were modeled from the perspectives of a private payer and a publicly funded program. Cost data were drawn from a national claims database and MediCal. The main outcome measures included 1-year and 5-year costs and number of pregnancies avoided compared with use of no contraceptive method. Results. All 15 contraceptives were more effective and less costly than no method. Over 5 years, the copper-T IUD, vasectomy, the contraceptive implant, and the injectable contraceptive were the most cost-effective, saving $14 122, $13 899, $13 813, and $13 373, respectively, and preventing approximately (4.2) per person. Because of their high failure rates, barrier methods, spermicides, withdrawal, and periodic abstinence were costly but still saved from $8933 to $12 239 over 5 years. Oral contraceptives fell between these groups, costing $1784 over 5 years, saving $12 879, and preventing 4.1 pregnancies. Conclusions. Contraceptives save health care resources by preventing unintended pregnancies. Up-front acquisition costs are inaccurate predictors of the total economic costs of competing contraceptive methods.
引用
收藏
页码:494 / 503
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
*A GUTTM I, 1994, UN UN INS COV REPR H
[2]  
BRADLEY T, 1991, WICHITA BUSINES 0906, P11
[3]   ORAL-CONTRACEPTIVES AND REPRODUCTIVE CANCERS - WEIGHING THE RISKS AND BENEFITS [J].
COKER, AL ;
HARLAP, S ;
FORTNEY, JA .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1993, 25 (01) :17-+
[4]  
COKER AL, 1993, FAM PLANN PERSPECT, V25, P36
[5]   PUBLIC FUNDING FOR CONTRACEPTIVE, STERILIZATION AND ABORTION SERVICES, FISCAL YEAR 1992 [J].
DALEY, D ;
GOLD, RB .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1993, 25 (06) :244-251
[6]   THE SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE-BEHAVIOR OF AMERICAN WOMEN, 1982-1988 [J].
FORREST, JD ;
SINGH, S .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1990, 22 (05) :206-214
[7]  
*GA CTR DIS CONTR, 1993, 1992 ANN REP
[8]  
*GYN PHARM INC, 1994, PAR T380A PRESCR INF
[9]  
HARLAP S, 1991, PREVENTING PREGNANCY
[10]  
HATCHER RA, 1994, CONTRACEPTIVE TECHNO