SNIFF NASAL INSPIRATORY PRESSURE - A NONINVASIVE ASSESSMENT OF INSPIRATORY MUSCLE STRENGTH

被引:158
作者
HERITIER, F
RAHM, F
PASCHE, P
FITTING, JW
机构
[1] CHU VAUDOIS,DIV PNEUMOL,CH-1011 LAUSANNE,SWITZERLAND
[2] CHU VAUDOIS,SERV OTORHINOLARYNGOL,CH-1011 LAUSANNE,SWITZERLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1164/ajrccm.150.6.7952632
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The measurement of esophageal pressure during maximal sniffs (sniff Pes) has been shown useful to assess inspiratory muscle strength. The aim of this study was to validate a non invasive method for estimating sniff Pes. The sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) was measured through a plug occluding one nostril during sniffs performed through the contralateral nostril. Sniff Pes was simultaneously measured with an esophageal balloon. Ten normal subjects performed 338 sniffs of variable intensity. The correlation coefficient of SNIP and sniff Pes was 0.99 +/- 0.01 (p < 0.001). The ratio SNIP/sniff Pes was 0.91 (range, 0.82 to 0.99) and the mean difference between the two measures(SNIP - sniff Pes) was -4.56 cm H2O (-1.2 to -8.6 cm H2O). Twelve patients with neuromuscular or skeletal disorders performed 181 maximal sniffs. The correlation coefficient of SNIP and sniff Pes was 0.96 +/- 0.04 (p < 0.001). The ratio SNIP/sniff Pes was 0.93 (0.77 to 1.07) and the mean difference (SNIP - sniff Pes) was -4.66 cm H2O (+0.47 to -14.26 cm H2O). Nasal mucosal congestion was induced by nebulization of increasing doses of histamine in four normal subjects. The ratio SNIP/sniff Pes was 0.93 (0.72 to 1.02) when nasal peak flow was > 100 L/min, and 0.49 (0.36 to 0.57 L/min) when nasal peak flow fell below 100 L/min. We conclude that SNIP provides a reliable and noninvasive estimation of sniff Pes in normal subjects and in patients with neuromuscular or skeletal disorders. The validity of this method may by impaired by severe nasal congestion.
引用
收藏
页码:1678 / 1683
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
BLACK LF, 1969, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V99, P696
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   MAXIMUM NASAL INSPIRATORY FLOW AND NASAL RESISTANCE [J].
BRIDGER, GP ;
PROCTOR, DF .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1970, 79 (03) :481-&
[4]   DYNAMIC CHANGES IN HUMAN DIAPHRAGM LENGTH - MAXIMAL INSPIRATORY AND EXPULSIVE EFFORTS STUDIED WITH SEQUENTIAL RADIOGRAPHY [J].
GANDEVIA, SC ;
GORMAN, RB ;
MCKENZIE, DK ;
SOUTHON, FCG .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1992, 457 :167-176
[5]  
HAIGHT JSJ, 1983, LARYNGOSCOPE, V93, P49
[6]  
HEIJDRA YF, 1993, EUR RESPIR J, V6, P541
[7]   MAXIMAL SNIFF MOUTH PRESSURE COMPARED WITH MAXIMAL INSPIRATORY PRESSURE IN ACUTE RESPIRATORY-FAILURE [J].
HERITIER, F ;
PERRET, C ;
FITTING, JW .
CHEST, 1991, 100 (01) :175-178
[8]   ESOPHAGEAL AND MOUTH PRESSURE DURING SNIFFS WITH AND WITHOUT NASAL OCCLUSION [J].
HERITIER, F ;
PERRET, C ;
FITTING, JW .
RESPIRATION PHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 86 (03) :305-313
[9]   THE MEASUREMENT OF INSPIRATORY MUSCLE STRENGTH BY SNIFF ESOPHAGEAL, NASOPHARYNGEAL, AND MOUTH PRESSURES [J].
KOULOURIS, N ;
MULVEY, DA ;
LAROCHE, CM ;
SAWICKA, EH ;
GREEN, M ;
MOXHAM, J .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1989, 139 (03) :641-646
[10]   THE VALUE OF SNIFF ESOPHAGEAL PRESSURES IN THE ASSESSMENT OF GLOBAL INSPIRATORY MUSCLE STRENGTH [J].
LAROCHE, CM ;
MIER, AK ;
MOXHAM, J ;
GREEN, M .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1988, 138 (03) :598-603