DOPAMINE ANTAGONISTS CAN INHIBIT METHAMPHETAMINE SENSITIZATION, BUT NOT COCAINE SENSITIZATION, WHEN ASSESSED BY AMBULATORY ACTIVITY IN MICE

被引:56
作者
KURIBARA, H
UCHIHASHI, Y
机构
[1] Division for Behavior Analysis, Behavior Research Institute, Gunma University School of Medicine, Maebashi, 371
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.2042-7158.1993.tb07177.x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The repeated subcutaneous administration of methamphetamine (2 mg kg(-1)) and cocaine (10 mg kg(-1)) at 3-4 day intervals induced sensitization to their ambulation-increasing effects in mice. Subcutaneous administration of SCH 23390 (R-(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine; 0.003-0-03 mg kg(-1)) and YM-09151-2 (cis-N-(1-benzyl-2-methylpyrrolidin-3-yl) 2-methoxy-4-methylaminobenzamide; 0.003-0.03 mg kg(-1)), the selective dopamine D-1 and D-2 antagonists, respectively, reduced dose-dependently the acute ambulation-increasing effect of methamphetamine. The development of methamphetamine sensitization was inhibited when it was administered in combination with either SCH 23390 or YM-09151-2 in the repeated administration schedule. Although SCH 23390 (0.01-0.1 mg kg(-1)) and YM-09151-2 (0.01-0.1 mg kg(-1)) also reduced the ambulation-increasing effect of cocaine (10 mg kg(-1)), neither drug inhibited the cocaine sensitization. Mice given cocaine with SCH 23390 (0.03 mg kg(-1)) or YM-09151-2 (0.03 and 0.1 mg kg(-1)) showed higher sensitivity than those given cocaine alone. The present results suggest that, although both the dopamine D-1 and D-2 antagonists reduce the acute stimulant effects of both methamphetamine and cocaine, they are only effective for inhibition of the methamphetamine sensitization. Mechanisms other than the dopaminergic system appear to be involved in the cocaine sensitization.
引用
收藏
页码:1042 / 1045
页数:4
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   ENHANCED EXTRACELLULAR DOPAMINE LEVEL MAY BE THE FUNDAMENTAL NEUROPHARMACOLOGICAL BASIS OF CROSS-BEHAVIORAL SENSITIZATION BETWEEN METHAMPHETAMINE AND COCAINE - AN INVIVO DIALYSIS STUDY IN FREELY MOVING RATS [J].
AKIMOTO, K ;
HAMAMURA, T ;
KAZAHAYA, Y ;
AKIYAMA, K ;
OTSUKI, S .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1990, 507 (02) :344-346
[2]  
ASAMI T, 1987, JPN J PSYCHOPHARMACO, V7, P237
[3]  
CREESE I, 1983, NEUROLEPTICS NEUROCH, P183
[4]   BEHAVIORAL TOLERANCE TO AMPHETAMINE AND OTHER PSYCHOSTIMULANTS - THE CASE FOR CONSIDERING BEHAVIORAL MECHANISMS [J].
DEMELLWEEK, C ;
GOUDIE, AJ .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1983, 80 (04) :287-307
[5]  
FISCHMAN MW, 1987, PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY 3, P1543
[6]   EFFECTS OF ACUTE COCAINE TREATMENT ON TURNOVER OF 5-HYDROXYTRYPTAMINE IN RAT-BRAIN [J].
FRIEDMAN, E ;
GERSHON, S ;
ROTROSEN, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1975, 54 (01) :61-64
[7]   STUDIES ON DISTINCTION BETWEEN UPTAKE INHIBITION AND RELEASE OF [H-3] DOPAMINE IN RAT-BRAIN TISSUE-SLICES [J].
HEIKKILA, RE ;
ORLANSKY, H ;
COHEN, G .
BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1975, 24 (08) :847-852
[8]   COMPARISON OF SENSITIZATION TO AMBULATION-INCREASING EFFECTS OF COCAINE AND METHAMPHETAMINE AFTER REPEATED ADMINISTRATION IN MICE [J].
HIRABAYASHI, M ;
OKADA, S ;
TADOKORO, S .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1991, 43 (12) :827-830
[9]   ENHANCING EFFECT OF METHAMPHETAMINE ON AMBULATORY ACTIVITY PRODUCED BY REPEATED ADMINISTRATION IN MICE [J].
HIRABAYASHI, M ;
ALAM, MR .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1981, 15 (06) :925-932
[10]  
HIRABAYASHI M, 1977, FOLIA PHARM JAPAN, V74, P629