RESOURCE CONSTRAINED PROJECT SCHEDULING WITH MULTIPLE OBJECTIVES - A DECISION SUPPORT APPROACH

被引:10
作者
DAVIS, KR [1 ]
STAM, A [1 ]
GRZYBOWSKI, RA [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV OSNABRUCK,FACHBEREICH WIRTSCHAFTWISSENSCH,W-4500 OSNABRUCK,GERMANY
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0305-0548(92)90035-4
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Over the past 30 years, various formulations of the project scheduling problem have been proposed. Traditionally, the managerial focus of most project scheduling formulations has been on the single objective of minimizing project completion time. Other relevant factors which legitimately should be included as an objective, such as physical, financial, and human resources, have either been assumed to be available in plentiful quantities, or have been accounted for in the form of rigid resource constraints. In this paper, an interactive decision support approach is introduced for explicitly considering multiple factors, simultaneously, in a multiobjective decision making framework. The approach enhances the traditional project scheduling framework in that it allows the decision maker to examine the minimization of project completion time as well as the balancing of available resurces. The approach thus makes the decision process for the project scheduling problem more flexible because various tradeoffs between project completion time and resource requirements can be evaluated. The decision support framework employs an interactive procedure based on vector maximization. Use of the method is illustrated with an example, and results from the example are compared with traditional single objective mathematical programming, preemptive goal programming, and Archemedian goal programming.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 669
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1976, DECISIONS MULTIPLE O
[3]   A COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF INTERACTIVE SOLUTION METHODS FOR MULTIPLE OBJECTIVE DECISION-MODELS [J].
BUCHANAN, JT ;
DAELLENBACH, HG .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1987, 29 (03) :353-359
[4]  
Conway RW., 1967, THEORY SCHEDULING
[5]  
Davis E. W., 1973, AIIE T, V5, P297
[6]   COMPARISON OF HEURISTIC AND OPTIMUM SOLUTIONS IN RESOURCE-CONSTRAINED PROJECT SCHEDULING [J].
DAVIS, EW ;
PATTERSON, JH .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE SERIES B-APPLICATION, 1975, 21 (08) :944-955
[7]   SCHEDULING A PROJECT TO MAXIMIZE ITS PRESENT VALUE - ZERO-ONE PROGRAMMING APPROACH [J].
DOERSCH, RH ;
PATTERSON, JH .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1977, 23 (08) :882-889
[8]   EVALUATING PROJECT SCHEDULING AND DUE DATE ASSIGNMENT PROCEDURES - AN EXPERIMENTAL-ANALYSIS [J].
DUMOND, J ;
MABERT, VA .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1988, 34 (01) :101-118
[9]  
FLEMING QW, 1987, PROJECT PRODUCTION S
[10]   A REVIEW OF PRODUCTION SCHEDULING [J].
GRAVES, SC .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1981, 29 (04) :646-675