Gender assignment and gender agreement: Evidence from pronominal gender languages

被引:17
作者
Audring, Jenny [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1105, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Gender; Gender assignment; Gender agreement; Pronominal gender; Typology; Morphology; Agreement; Pronouns;
D O I
10.1007/s11525-009-9124-y
中图分类号
H [语言、文字];
学科分类号
05 ;
摘要
In research on grammatical gender, assignment and agreement are the two central notions. Genders are defined as systems of agreement classes, and the assignment of nouns to genders is reflected in the agreement they consistently trigger on associated elements. Yet, gender assignment and gender agreement are often discussed quite separately. This paper investigates the possibility that gender agreement is not only an overt manifestation of gender assignment, but that properties of agreement systems can themselves constrain the assignment systems they express. The paper discusses typological and diachronic evidence for the fact that not every type of assignment system can be expressed in every type of agreement system.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 116
页数:24
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, PRONOMINAL GENDER EN
[2]  
ARNDT WW, 1970, WORD, V26, P244, DOI DOI 10.1080/00437956.1970.11435595
[3]  
Asher Ronald E., 1997, MALAYALAM
[4]  
Audring J., REINVENTING IN PRESS
[5]  
Audring Jenny., 2006, J GER LINGUIST, V18, P85, DOI DOI 10.1017/S1470542706000043
[6]  
Austin P., 1981, GRAMMAR DIY IN PRESS
[7]  
Baerman Matthew, 2005, SYNTAX MORPHOLOGY IN
[8]  
Barlow M., 1992, SITUATED THEORY AGRE
[9]  
Barlow Michael, 1991, P 17 ANN M BERKELEY, P30
[10]  
Blake B. J, 1979, HDB AUSTR LANGUAGES, V1, P183