COMPARISON OF LINEAR AND CONFIGURAL MMPI DIAGNOSTIC METHODS WITH AN UNCONTAMINATED CRITERION

被引:18
作者
GIANNETTI, RA [1 ]
JOHNSON, JH [1 ]
KLINGLER, DE [1 ]
WILLIAMS, TA [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV UTAH,DEPT PSYCHIAT,SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84112
关键词
criterion contamination; linear vs configural MMPI diagnostic methods; male veterans;
D O I
10.1037/0022-006X.46.5.1046
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Suggests that previous studies of linear and configural MMPI diagnostic predictors have suffered from varying degrees of criterion contamination. Previous findings were replicated and extended with 572 male veterans, mean age 37.7 yrs, who were evaluated at the time of application for treatment with the Current and Past Psychopathology Scales. Ss were also administered the Shipley-Institute of Living Scale for Measuring Intellectual Impairment and were diagnostically classified without MMPI contamination. The Goldberg linear equations derived from MMPI group profiles achieved 84% accuracy in classifying group profiles and a 14% increment over base-rate accuracy in classifying individual profiles. The Goldberg linear equation and several configural methods for discriminating psychotics from neurotics were compared. The linear equation was found to be most accurate. Conflicting results in previous articles suggest that criterion contamination must be avoided in prediction studies. A possible use for the group profile classification equations in evaluating experimental studies is suggested. (20 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved). © 1978 American Psychological Association.
引用
收藏
页码:1046 / 1052
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
*AM PSYCH ASS, 1968, DIAGN STAT MAUN MENT
[2]  
ENDICOTT J, 1972, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V27, P678
[3]  
FLEISS JL, 1971, PSYCHOL BULL, V76, P378, DOI 10.1037/h0031619
[5]   SEARCH FOR CONFIGURAL RELATIONSHIPS IN PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT - DIAGNOSIS OF PSYCHOSIS VERSUS NEUROSIS FROM MMPI [J].
GOLDBERG, LR .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH MONOGRAPHS, 1969, 4 (04) :523-536
[6]  
GOLDBERG LR, 1965, PSYCHOLOGICAL MONOGR, V79
[7]  
GOODSON JH, 1976, J CLIN PSYCHOL, V32, P328, DOI 10.1002/1097-4679(197604)32:2<328::AID-JCLP2270320228>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-2
[9]  
Gough H.G., 1950, J CONSULT PSYCHOL, V14, P408, DOI 10.1037/h0054506
[10]  
HAYS WL, 1963, STATISTICS PSYCHOLOG