FREQUENCY, SEVERITY AND SYMPTOMATOLOGY OF HYPOGLYCEMIA - A COMPARATIVE TRIAL OF HUMAN AND PORCINE INSULINS IN TYPE-1 DIABETIC-PATIENTS

被引:12
作者
MACLEOD, KM
GOLD, AE
FRIER, BM
机构
[1] Department of Diabetes, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh
关键词
HYPOGLYCEMIA; FREQUENCY OF HYPOGLYCEMIA; SEVERITY OF HYPOGLYCEMIA; HUMAN INSULIN; PORCINE INSULIN; SYMPTOMS OF HYPOGLYCEMIA;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-5491.1995.tb00444.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
A randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial was performed to compare the frequency, severity, and symptomatology of hypoglycaemia during treatment with porcine and human insulins. Forty patients with Type 1 diabetes (20 newly diagnosed and 20 with diabetes of 5-20 years duration) were treated with human and porcine insulins for consecutive 3-month periods, in random order. Episodes of hypoglycaemia were recorded prospectively with self-reporting of the presence and intensity of symptoms using a standardized scoring technique. Serial measurements of glycated haemoglobin and review of home blood glucose tests confirmed that similar glycaemic control was achieved with each insulin species. On comparison of the treatment periods with human and porcine insulins, no differences were demonstrated in the total frequency of symptomatic hypoglycaemia (3.10 vs 3.06 episodes patient(-1) 3-months(-1); p = 0.94), the frequency of severe hypoglycaemia (0.1 vs 0.2 episodes patient(-1) 3-months(-1); p = 0.44), the occurrence of asymptomatic biochemical hypoglycaemia (0.75 vs 0.68 episodes patient(-1) 3-months(-1); p = 0.81), and the capillary blood glucose concentration at the onset of hypoglycaemic symptoms (2.6 +/- 0.2 vs 2.4 +/- 0.3 mmol l(-1); p = 0.40), with all results being expressed for human vs porcine treatment periods, respectively. The symptoms of hypoglycaemia did not differ during the treatment periods with each insulin species. In conclusion, treatment with human insulin had no effect upon the symptomatic response to hypoglycaemia, did not increase the total frequency of hypoglycaemia, and did not emerge as a significant risk factor for severe hypoglycaemia in these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 141
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Clark AJL, Adeniyi-Jones RO, Knight G., Leiper JM, Wiles PG, Jones RH, Et al., Biosynthetic human insulin in the treatment of diabetes. A double‐blind crossover trial in established diabetic patients, Lancet, 2, pp. 354-357, (1982)
[2]  
Peacock I., Tattersall RB, Taylor A., Douglas CA, Reeves WG, Metabolic and hormonal parameters after insulin‐induced hypoglycaemia in man: comparison between biosynthetic human insulin and purified pork insulin, Hormone Metab Res, 17, pp. 351-354, (1985)
[3]  
Home PD, Mann NP, Hutchison AS, Park R., Walford S., Murphy M., Reeves WG, A fifteen‐month double blind cross‐over study of the efficacy and antigenicity of human and pork insulins, Diabetic Med, 1, pp. 93-98, (1984)
[4]  
Fisher BM, Gray CE, Beastall GH, Frier BM, Responses to acute insulin‐induced hypoglycaemia in diabetic patients: a comparison of short‐acting human and porcine insulins, Diabetes Res, 8, pp. 1-8, (1988)
[5]  
Berger WG, Althaus BV, Reduced awareness of hypoglycaemia after changing from porcine to human insulin in IDDM (Letter), Diabetes Care, 10, pp. 260-261, (1987)
[6]  
Teuscher A., Berger W., Hypoglycaemia unawareness in diabetics transferred from beef/porcine to human insulin, Lancet, 2, pp. 382-385, (1987)
[7]  
Teuscher A., Egger M., Human insulin hypoglycaemia unawareness (Letter), Lancet, 1, (1989)
[8]  
Berger M., Human insulin: much ado about hypoglycaemia (un)awareness, Diabetologia, 30, pp. 829-833, (1987)
[9]  
Heine RJ, Van der Veen EA, Human insulin and hypoglycaemia (Letter), Lancet, 1, (1990)
[10]  
Jick H., Hall GC, Dean AD, Jick SS, Derby LE, A comparison of the risks of hypoglycaemia between users of human and animal insulins. 1. Experience in the United Kingdom, Pharmacotherapy, 10, pp. 395-397, (1990)