NONINVASIVE AORTOILIAC ASSESSMENT

被引:29
作者
CURRIE, IC
JONES, AJ
WAKELEY, CJ
TENNANT, WG
WILSON, YA
BAIRD, RN
LAMONT, PM
机构
[1] Department of Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol
[2] Department of Radiodiagnosis, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol
关键词
DUPLEX ULTRASOUND; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASE; NONINVASIVE TESTS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/S1078-5884(05)80220-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To assess the accuracy of Duplex ultrasound in the assessment of aortoiliac disease. Design: Prospective, semi-blind study. Setting: Vascular laboratory and radiology departments, University Hospital. Materials and Methods: Ninety-two patients underwent assessments of the aortoiliac segment by femoral pulse palpation, Duplex ultrasound and biplanar arteriography. Of these 184 aortoiliac segments, 68 were also assessed by intraarterial pressure measurements and 80 by magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). Main Results: Femoral pulses were abnormal in all 32 occluded aortoiliac segments. Of 152 patent segments, femoral pulse palpation was misleading in 50 (33%). MRA detected all occlusions and had a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 68% for stenoses, compared to arteriography. Colour flow Duplex misdiagnosed four occlusions as stenoses. Duplex had a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 93% for stenoses when compared to arteriography. Two stenoses, detected by Duplex and confirmed by pressure gradients, were missed by arteriography. Conclusions: Pressure measurements remain the gold standard for aortoiliac examination, arteriography providing only morphological information. The limitations of femoral pulse palpation should be appreciated. Although MRA was faster, Duplex examination proved slightly more sensitive to stenoses. At present, colour Duplex provides the best non-invasive assessment of aortoiliac disease and could prevent unnecessary arteriograms.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 28
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Edwards, Coldwell, Goldman, Strandness, The role of Duplex scanning in the selection of patients for transluminal angioplasty, J Vasc Surg, 13, pp. 69-74, (1991)
  • [2] Legemate, Teeuwen, Hoenweld, Eikelboom, Value of Duplex scanning compared with angiography and pressure measurement in the assessment of aortoiliac arterial lesions, Br J Surg, 78, pp. 1003-1008, (1991)
  • [3] Mostbeck, Caputo, Higgins, MR measurement of blood flow in the cardiovascular system, Am J R, 159, pp. 453-461, (1992)
  • [4] Baker, Macpherson, Evans, Bell, Pressure studies in arterial surgery, Eur J Vasc Surg, 1, pp. 273-283, (1987)
  • [5] Sobinsky, Borozan, Gray, Schuler, Flanigan, Is femoral pulse palpation accurate in assessing haemodynamic significance of aortoiliac occlusive disease?, Am J Surg, 148, pp. 214-216, (1984)
  • [6] Campbell, Cole, Skidmore, Baird, The clinician and the vascular laboratory in the diagnosis of aortoiliac stenosis, Br J Surg, 71, pp. 302-306, (1984)
  • [7] Lamont, Adamson, Darke, Femoral pulse palpation before and after exercise — a guide to occult iliac stenosis, J Cardiovasc Surg, 33, pp. 432-436, (1992)
  • [8] Mohiaddin, Sampson, Firmin, Longmore, Magnetic resonance morphology, chemical shift and flow imaging in peripheral vascular disease, Eur J Vasc Surg, 5, pp. 383-396, (1991)
  • [9] Sumner, Blood flow measurement with nuclear magnetic resonance technology: A clinically applicable technique?, J Vasc Surg, 14, pp. 700-702, (1991)
  • [10] Legemate, Ackerstaff, Eikelboom, Duplex scanning in cerebral, abdominal and peripheral artery disease, Eur J Vasc Surg, 3, pp. 287-295, (1989)