AN INTEGRATION AND REPRISE - WHAT WE THINK WE HAVE LEARNED

被引:2
作者
PLAKE, BS
机构
[1] University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0348
关键词
D O I
10.1207/s15324818ame0801_6
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article summarizes and contrasts the three standard-setting methods described in this special issue: judgmental policy capturing, the extended Angoff method, and the dominant profile method. An integrative summary of findings is presented, followed by conclusions concerning the relative efficacy and utility of the three methods. The article concludes with recommendations for modifying the methods and for further investigations of their psychometric properties.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 92
页数:8
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]  
Angoff W. H., 1971, ED MEASUREMENT, P514
[2]   USING AN EXTENDED ANGOFF PROCEDURE TO SET STANDARDS ON COMPLEX PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS [J].
HAMBLETON, RK ;
PLAKE, BS .
APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, 1995, 8 (01) :41-55
[3]  
Jaeger R., 1982, EDUC EVAL POLICY AN, V4, P461
[4]   SETTING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS THROUGH 2-STAGE JUDGMENTAL POLICY CAPTURING [J].
JAEGER, RM .
APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, 1995, 8 (01) :15-40
[5]   ABSOLUTE GRADING STANDARDS FOR OBJECTIVE TESTS [J].
Nedelsky, Leo .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1954, 14 (01) :3-19
[6]   A MULTISTAGE DOMINANT PROFILE METHOD FOR SETTING STANDARDS ON COMPLEX PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS [J].
PUTNAM, SE ;
PENCE, P ;
JAEGER, RM .
APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, 1995, 8 (01) :57-83