TC-99M-POLYCLONAL IGG AND TC-99M NANOCOLLOID SCANS IN ORTHOPEDICS - A COMPARISON WITH CONVENTIONAL BONE-SCAN

被引:21
作者
ANG, ES
SUNDRAM, FX
GOH, ASW
AW, SE
机构
[1] Department of Nuclear Medicine, Singapore General Hospital
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00006231-199306000-00004
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The bone scan is sensitive in detection of active bone/joint lesions. A normal bone scan virtually excludes the presence of an inflammatory process with high precision, but the poor specificity of bone scans is well known. In recent years, various new agents including Tc-99m-hexamethylpropylene amine oxime (HMPAO)-labelled white blood cells, nanocolloid, polyclonal IgG, anti-granulocyte antibody, In-111-labelled IgG, leucocytes, chemotactic peptides etc. have been widely evaluated in inflammatory imaging, especially in the orthopaedic context. This study was undertaken to compare the usefulness of Tc-99m-nanocolloid and Tc-99m-polyclonal IgG in the detection of focal bone/joint inflammation. Twenty-seven patients with a common presentation of bone/joint pain resulting from various pathologies were included in the study. A total of 47 lesions were imaged. The overall sensitivity and specificity of both nanocolloid scan and IgG scan were identical with 95% sensitivity and 100% specificity, in detecting inflammatory foci. However, specificity dropped to 18% with nanocolloid scans and 16% with IgG scans when an attempt was made to distinguish noninfective from infective inflammatory processes; thus neither type of scan permits differentiation between septic and nonseptic inflammatory processes with sufficient accuracy. As both nanocolloid and IgG scans are equally sensitive and specific in detecting inflammation, the choice of type of scan will depend on cost, imaging time and availability of the radiopharmaceutical.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 432
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Gupta N.C., Prezio J.A., Et al., Radionuclide imaging in osteomyelitis, Semin Nucl Med, 18, pp. 287-299, (1988)
[2]  
Alazraki N., Dries D., Datz F., Et al., Value of a 24 hour image (Four phase bone scan) in assessing osteomyelitis in patients with peripheral vascular disease, J Nucl Med, 26, pp. 711-717, (1985)
[3]  
Israel O., Gips S., Jerushalim J., Et al., Osteomyelitis and soft- tissue infection: Differential diagnosis in the 24 hr/4 hr ratio of 99Tcm MDP uptake, Radiology, 163, pp. 725-726, (1987)
[4]  
Lamki L.M., Bone scintigraphy: Current trends and future prospects, J Nucl Med, 26, pp. 312-313, (1985)
[5]  
Gupta N.C., Lama P., Prezio J.A., Comparative efficacy of 99Tcm MDP four phase bone and 11 !In leucocyte imaging in osteomyelitis, J Nucl Med, 28, (1987)
[6]  
Kim E.E., Pjura G.A., Lowry P.A., Et al., Osteomyelitis complicating fractures: Pitfalls of lnIn leukocyte scintigraphy, Am J Radiol, 148, pp. 927-930, (1987)
[7]  
Dutcher J.P., Schiffer C.A., Johnston G., Rapid migration of lnIn-labeled granulocytes to sites of infection, N Engl J Med, 304, pp. 586-589, (1981)
[8]  
Morgan J.R., Williams L.A., Howard C.B., Technetium- labelled liposome imaging for deep-seated infection, Br J Radiol, 58, pp. 35-39, (1985)
[9]  
Zanelli G.D., Bjarnason I., Smith T., Grawley J., Levi A.J., Copeland RI. 99Tcm-labeled porphyrin as an imaging agent for occult infections and inflammation, Nucl Med Commun, 7, pp. 17-24, (1986)
[10]  
Rusckowski M., Fritz B., Hnatowich D., Improved localization of inflammation with streptavidin-biotin as a substitute for antibody, J Nucl Med, 32, (1991)