CHEMOSENSITIZATION BY VERAPAMIL AND CYCLOSPORINE-A IN MOUSE-TUMOR CELLS EXPRESSING DIFFERENT LEVELS OF P-GLYCOPROTEIN AND CP22 (SORCIN)

被引:57
作者
TWENTYMAN, PR [1 ]
REEVE, JG [1 ]
KOCH, G [1 ]
WRIGHT, KA [1 ]
机构
[1] MRC,MOLEC BIOL LAB,CAMBRIDGE CB2 2QH,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1038/bjc.1990.235
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The relationships between resistance to adriamycin, vincristine, colchicine and etopside, expression of P-glycoprotein and CP22 (sorcin), and resistance modification by verapamil and cyclosporin A have been studied in a panel of multidrug-resistant (MDR) mouse tumour cell lines. Whereas there was a generally good correlation between the degree of resistance and the amount of P-glycoprotein, no relationship between resistance and CP22 expression was seen. At 3. 3 μM verapamil, the sensitisation of the MDR cell lines was no greater than that of the parent line. At 6. 6 μM verapamil, however, sensitisation of the MDR lines generally exceeded that of the parent line, although the line CR 2. 0, expressing very high levels of P-glycoprotein was an exception. Little sensitisation to etoposide was seen in any of the lines. When cyclosporin A was used as the sensitiser at either 2. 1 or 4. 2 μM, there was a greater effect in lines expressing moderate to high levels of P-glycoprotein than in the parent line, although this tendency was less for adriamycin than for the other cytotoxics. Sensitisation to etoposide was much greater with cyclosporin A than with verapamil. At low levels (< 1 μM) of CsA, however, sensitisation to colchicine was greater in the parent line than in cell line CR 2. 0. These studies indicate that chemosensitisation by verapamil and cyclosporin A is extremely complex, depending upon sensitiser dose, the particular cytotoxic and the cell line. At low doses of the sensitisers, the sensitisation may be greater in lines expressing low levels of P-glycoprotein than in lines showing high levels. © The MacMillan Press Ltd., 1990.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 95
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
BECK WT, 1987, CANCER RES, V47, P5455
[2]   MECHANISM OF MULTIDRUG RESISTANCE [J].
BRADLEY, G ;
JURANKA, PF ;
LING, V .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, 1988, 948 (01) :87-128
[3]  
CARMICHAEL J, 1987, CANCER RES, V47, P936
[4]   EFFECT OF CALCIUM-ANTAGONISTS ON THE CHEMOSENSITIVITY OF 2 MULTIDRUG-RESISTANT HUMAN-TUMOR CELL-LINES WHICH DO NOT OVEREXPRESS P-GLYCOPROTEIN [J].
COLE, SPC ;
DOWNES, HF ;
SLOVAK, ML .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1989, 59 (01) :42-46
[5]  
COLEY HKM, 1989, BIOCHEM PHARMACOL, V24, P4467
[6]   IDENTIFICATION OF ANTHRACYCLINES AND RELATED AGENTS THAT RETAIN PREFERENTIAL ACTIVITY OVER ADRIAMYCIN IN MULTIDRUG-RESISTANT CELL-LINES, AND FURTHER RESISTANCE MODIFICATION BY VERAPAMIL AND CYCLOSPORINE-A [J].
COLEY, HM ;
TWENTYMAN, PR ;
WORKMAN, P .
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1989, 24 (05) :284-290
[7]  
CORNWELL MM, 1987, J BIOL CHEM, V262, P2166
[8]  
CROOP JM, 1987, CANCER RES, V47, P5982
[9]   ACTIVE OUTWARD TRANSPORT OF DAUNOMYCIN IN RESISTANT EHRLICH ASCITES TUMOR-CELLS [J].
DANO, K .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, 1973, 323 (03) :466-483
[10]   DNA-MEDIATED TRANSFER OF MULTIPLE-DRUG RESISTANCE AND PLASMA-MEMBRANE GLYCOPROTEIN EXPRESSION [J].
DEBENHAM, PG ;
KARTNER, N ;
SIMINOVITCH, L ;
RIORDAN, JR ;
LING, V .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, 1982, 2 (08) :881-889