DECREASE IN THE ANORECTAL PRESSURE-GRADIENT AFTER LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION OF THE RECTUM - A STUDY USING CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY MANOMETRY

被引:53
作者
WILLIAMSON, MER [1 ]
LEWIS, WG [1 ]
HOLDSWORTH, PJ [1 ]
FINAN, PJ [1 ]
JOHNSTON, D [1 ]
机构
[1] GEN INFIRM, CTR DIGEST DIS, LEEDS LS1 3EX, W YORKSHIRE, ENGLAND
关键词
LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; RECTAL CARCINOMA; ANORECTAL PHYSIOLOGY; CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY MANOMETRY;
D O I
10.1007/BF02257786
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE: Changes in anorectal function alter low anterior resection of the rectum (LAR) often lead to symptoms of urgency and frequency of defecation, the anterior resection syndrome. It has been reported that preservation of part of the rectum improves clinical results, but why this should be remains unclear.,METHODS: We have carried out continuous ambulatory manometric studies in two groups of patients: 11 patients, a median of 11 (range, 5-96) months after LAR, in whom the median anastomotic level above the anal high-pressure zone was 0 (range, 0-2) cm; 9 patients, a median of 6 (range, 3-12) months after sigmoid colectomy, in whom the rectum remained in situ and who acted as controls. RESULTS: Comparing the LAR group with controls, resting anal pressures were lower, median 68 (range 27-102) cm H2O vs. 95 (45-116) cm H2O (P < 0.05), and neorectal pressures were higher, 25 (0-48) cm H2O vs. 10 (0-10) cm H2O (P < 0.01). Thus the anorectal pressure gradients were less, 34 (0-74) cm H2O vs. 81 (35-113) cm H2O (P < 0.01). Slow-wave activity in the anal sphincter was present in six patients (55 percent) after coloanal anastomosis and eight patients (89 percent) after sigmoid colectomy. Sampling episodes were seen in only two patients (18 percent) after coloanal anastomosis and five patients (56 percent) after sigmoid colectomy. When clinical endpoints were compared (LAR vs. controls), bowel frequency in 24 hours was higher, 5 (3-8) vs. 2 (1-3) (P < 0.01); fecal leakage was more common, affecting seven patients (64 percent) vs. one patient (11 percent) (P < 0.05), and urgency of defecation was also more common. CONCLUSIONS: The inferior clinical results observed after LAR compared with the results after sigmoid colectomy are thus in part because of higher neorectal pressure acting on a weakened sphincter mechanism. These observations lend support to the idea that neorectal capacity should be increased in patients who undergo low anterior resection.
引用
收藏
页码:1228 / 1231
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   EFFECT OF ANTERIOR RESECTION ON ANAL-SPHINCTER FUNCTION [J].
HORGAN, PG ;
OCONNELL, PR ;
SHINKWIN, CA ;
KIRWAN, WO .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1989, 76 (08) :783-786
[2]  
IMHOF M, 1989, CHIRURG, V60, P584
[3]   FUNCTION OF THE DISTAL RECTUM AFTER LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION FOR CARCINOMA [J].
KARANJIA, ND ;
SCHACHE, DJ ;
HEALD, RJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 79 (02) :114-116
[4]   ANAL SPHINCTER-SAVING OPERATIONS FOR CHRONIC ULCERATIVE-COLITIS [J].
KELLY, KA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 163 (01) :5-11
[5]  
LAZORTHES F, 1986, BRIT J SURG, V73, P136, DOI 10.1002/bjs.1800730222
[6]   ROLE OF THE RECTUM IN THE PHYSIOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL-RESULTS OF COLOANAL AND COLORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS AFTER ANTERIOR RESECTION FOR RECTAL-CARCINOMA [J].
LEWIS, WG ;
HOLDSWORTH, PJ ;
STEPHENSON, BM ;
FINAN, PJ ;
JOHNSTON, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 79 (10) :1082-1086
[7]   MESORECTAL EXCISION FOR RECTAL-CANCER [J].
MACFARLANE, JK ;
RYALL, RDH ;
HEALD, RJ .
LANCET, 1993, 341 (8843) :457-460
[8]   SENSORY DISCRIMINATION AND DYNAMIC ACTIVITY IN THE ANORECTUM - EVIDENCE USING A NEW AMBULATORY TECHNIQUE [J].
MILLER, R ;
LEWIS, GT ;
BARTOLO, DCC ;
CERVERO, F ;
MORTENSEN, NJM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1988, 75 (10) :1003-1007
[9]   MECHANISM OF SPHINCTER IMPAIRMENT FOLLOWING LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION [J].
MOLLOY, RG ;
MORAN, KT ;
COULTER, J ;
WALDRON, R ;
KIRWAN, WO .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1992, 35 (05) :462-464
[10]   RESECTION AND COLOANAL ANASTOMOSIS WITH COLONIC RESERVOIR FOR RECTAL-CARCINOMA [J].
PARC, R ;
TIRET, E ;
FRILEUX, P ;
MOSZKOWSKI, E ;
LOYGUE, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1986, 73 (02) :139-141