IF YOURE LOOKING AT THE CELL MEANS, YOURE NOT LOOKING AT ONLY THE INTERACTION (UNLESS ALL MAIN EFFECTS ARE ZERO)

被引:80
作者
ROSNOW, RL
ROSENTHAL, R
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.574
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This reply to Meyer explains again that cell means, although usually the results of greatest interest, should not be confused with interaction effects. Unless all main effects are 0, one cannot accurately interpret an interaction by plotting the cell means. To interpret an interaction, it is the residuals remaining after removal of constituent effects (eg., row and column effects in 2-factor analyses) that must be examined.
引用
收藏
页码:574 / 576
页数:3
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Cochran W.G, 1957, STAT METHODS, V6th ed
[2]   DIFFERENTIAL CONSTRUAL AND THE FALSE CONSENSUS EFFECT [J].
GILOVICH, T .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 59 (04) :623-634
[3]  
Guilford JP, 1973, FUNDAMENTAL STAT PSY
[4]  
GUILFORD JP, 1978, FUNDAMENTAL STATISTI
[5]   HERING AND SCIENTIFIC ESTABLISHMENT [J].
HURVICH, LM .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1969, 24 (05) :497-&
[6]  
Keppel G, 1991, DESIGN ANAL RES HDB
[7]  
Lindquist E., 1953, DESIGN ANAL EXPT PSY
[8]   MISINTERPRETATION OF INTERACTION EFFECTS - A REPLY [J].
MEYER, DL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 110 (03) :571-573
[9]  
MILLER GA, 1969, HDB SOCIAL PSYCHOLOG, V3, P666
[10]  
MOSTELLER F, 1983, BEGINNING STATISTICS